From: Deepesh Varatharajan <deepesh.varatharajan@windriver.com>
To: Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>
Cc: Sundeep.Kokkonda@windriver.com,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, "Marko,
Peter" <peter.marko@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] rust: Drop oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:40:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e26998b-52a6-4d5e-964f-5f4b5c09b43c@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4863d03-6c88-421d-b613-d846818f6a54@windriver.com>
On 17-03-2026 02:38, Randy MacLeod wrote:
> On 2026-03-11 9:26 a.m., Varatharajan, Deepesh via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>> From: Deepesh Varatharajan<Deepesh.Varatharajan@windriver.com>
>>
>> This patch was originally introduced to address a rare failure on the PPC
>> target and with the latest version of rustc this issue no longer occurs.
>> So, this patch can be removed.
>
>
> FYI, merged:
> 3b5c2d8bdb 2026-03-11 rust: Drop
> oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch
>
> If this causes problems for anyone, please let us know and we can
> consider restoring the patch.
>
> Deepesh,
>
> Surely there's some existing data that you can point to,
> to convince upstream to double the timeout if not 10x it?
>
Currently I don’t have data since I can’t reproduce the failure with the
latest rustc.
If the failure happens again, I’ll collect the data and reach out to
upstream to discuss
increasing the timeout.
Regards,
Deepesh
> ../Randy
>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepesh Varatharajan<Deepesh.Varatharajan@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> ...crease-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch | 31 -------------------
>> meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc | 1 -
>> 2 files changed, 32 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index 5bd1abffb4..0000000000
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
>> -From b4524278985f517b0785b6f64a21380dcf1ff096 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> -From: Peter Tatrai<peter.tatrai.ext@siemens.com>
>> -Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:58:16 +0100
>> -Subject: [PATCH] oeqa/selftest: Increase timeout in process-sigpipe rust test
>> -
>> -This patch increases the timeout for the process-sigpipe rust test, which
>> -occasionally fails when the server is under heavy load. Increasing the timeout
>> -reduces the likelihood of false negatives under load.
>> -
>> -Fixes [YOCTO #15625]
>> -
>> -Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [OE testing specific]
>> -
>> -Signed-off-by: Peter Tatrai<peter.tatrai.ext@siemens.com>
>> ----
>> - tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs | 2 +-
>> - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> -
>> -diff --git a/tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs b/tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs
>> -index 11f363d62..c12d66016 100644
>> ---- a/tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs
>> -+++ b/tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs
>> -@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ use std::thread;
>> - fn main() {
>> - // Just in case `yes` or `while-echo` doesn't check for EPIPE...
>> - thread::spawn(|| {
>> -- thread::sleep_ms(5000);
>> -+ thread::sleep_ms(50000);
>> - process::exit(1);
>> - });
>> - // QNX Neutrino does not have `yes`. Therefore, use `while-echo` for `nto`
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc
>> index 04204969ba..47a0154cdc 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc
>> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ SRC_URI += "https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-${RUST_VERSION}-src.tar.xz;n
>> file://0001-Define-more-ioctl-codes-on-riscv32gc-unknown-linux-g.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
>> file://rust-oe-selftest.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
>> file://repro-issue-fix-with-cc-crate-hashmap.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
>> -file://oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
>> file://0001-src-core-build_steps-tool.rs-switch-off-lto-for-rust.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
>> file://0001-riscv32-Define-plain-syscalls-as-their-time64-varian.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
>> file://0001-Update-call-llvm-intrinsics-test.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>> View/Reply Online (#232879):https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/232879
>> Mute This Topic:https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118259934/3616765
>> Group Owner:openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
>> Unsubscribe:https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [randy.macleod@windriver.com]
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>
> --
> # Randy MacLeod
> # Wind River Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 13:26 [PATCH v2] rust: Drop oeqa-selftest-Increase-timeout-in-process-sigpipe-ru.patch Deepesh.Varatharajan
2026-03-16 21:08 ` [OE-core] " Randy MacLeod
2026-03-17 4:10 ` Deepesh Varatharajan [this message]
2026-03-17 15:00 ` Randy MacLeod
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e26998b-52a6-4d5e-964f-5f4b5c09b43c@windriver.com \
--to=deepesh.varatharajan@windriver.com \
--cc=Sundeep.Kokkonda@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=peter.marko@siemens.com \
--cc=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox