Hello Alex and Yoann, On 4/10/25 14:17, Yoann Congal via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Le jeu. 10 avr. 2025 à 12:14, Alexander Kanavin via > lists.openembedded.org > a écrit : > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 12:40, Jeroen Hofstee via > lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > For completeness, this is not some theoretical issue, always > calling if up > > directly after a network device is discovered does cause issues > and is > > against spec as well. > > > > The sed stuff isn't that complicated, is it? > > I beg to differ. The code is basically unreadable (unless you want to > write an elaborate comment with example input->output transformations > for every single line it), and that in itself is reason not to take > it. Any software solution must not only solve the problem, it must > also be written such that other humans can understand and change it. > > I think I'd prefer a patch to busybox; even if upstream rejects or > ignores it, we still have something that is easier to take care of. > > > FWIW, I agree with Alexander here. > A patch (even a local one) will be easier to maintain in the long run. > Cool, let me know when these patches have landed. Regards, Jeroen