From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB0D7918C for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTPSA id w7JMGxoX004561 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 19 Aug 2018 23:17:00 +0100 Message-ID: <8fbd032b3ff41ed4fb0656b2d1e8b011e98c8169.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Hongxu Jia , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 23:16:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <064dc928-7bbb-b537-75a4-273ecc1dfcfb@windriver.com> References: <1534490562-15144-1-git-send-email-hongxu.jia@windriver.com> <20180817073257.13840.94208@do.openembedded.org> <064dc928-7bbb-b537-75a4-273ecc1dfcfb@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.1 at dan X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yICJsaWJ4bWwyOiBmaXggQ1ZFLTIwMTgtOTI1MSBhbmQuLi4iIGFuZCAxIG1vcmU=?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:17:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 15:37 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote: > On 2018年08月17日 15:32, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: "libxml2: fix CVE-2018-9251 and..." and 1 more > > Revision: 1 > > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/13574/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. > > This is > > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the > > proposed > > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > > > > > * Issue Upstream-Status is in incorrect format > > [test_upstream_status_presence_format] > > Suggested fix Fix Upstream-Status format in 0001-Verify-that- > > we-are-not-reading-past-end-of-a-buffer.patch > > Current Upstream-Status: Cherry pick from upstream > > bugzilla [https://bugzilla.nasm.us/show_bug.cgi?id=3392447] > > Standard format Upstream-Status: > > Valid status Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied, > > Inappropriate [reason], Submitted [where] > > I am not sure which one to choose, the patch is not from > upstream, but its bugzilla, so `Backport' is not accurate That would be Submitted since upstream are aware of the patch. Cheers, Richard