Re: [PATCH] u-boot: mkimage: Fix build of u-boot-mkimage

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On 11/09/2016 01:15 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> 
> On 7 November 2016 at 18:20, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de
> <mailto:marex@denx.de>> wrote:
> 
>     -EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'CROSS_COMPILE="${TARGET_PREFIX}" CC="${CC}
>     ${CFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS}" STRIP=true V=1'
>     +EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'HOSTCC="${BUILD_CC} ${BUILD_CFLAGS} ${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"'
>     +EXTRA_OEMAKE_append_class-target =
>     'CROSS_COMPILE="${TARGET_PREFIX}" CC="${CC} ${CFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS}"
>     STRIP=true V=1'
>     +EXTRA_OEMAKE_append_class-native = 'CC="${BUILD_CC} ${BUILD_CFLAGS}
>     ${BUILD_LDFLAGS}" STRIP=true V=1'
>     +EXTRA_OEMAKE_append_class-nativesdk = 'CC="${BUILD_CC}
>     ${BUILD_CFLAGS} ${BUILD_LDFLAGS}" STRIP=true V=1'
> 
> 
> You're going to start hating u-boot...
> 
> Fails on the autobuilder if you're building for a 32-bit x86 target on a
> 64-bit x86 host:
> 
> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (x86-64, expected x86) on
> /work/i586-poky-linux-musl/u-boot-mkimage/1_2016.09.01-r0/packages-split/u-boot-mkimage/usr/bin/uboot-mkimage
> [arch]
> 
> I'm guessing that it is using the host compiler instead of the cross
> compiler.

I should have a fix for it all I hope.


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut