From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591E372F81 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2017 01:03:49 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,218,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="230520293" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2017 01:03:48 -0800 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1488244198-1976-1-git-send-email-california.l.sullivan@intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <92f0a8d5-028f-a017-cf3d-97ce96c74843@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:02:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/1] recipes-extended: Move efivar from meta-openembedded to oe-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:03:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/28/2017 10:58 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Everything outside oe-core is meant to be nice little colorful boxes > which don't depend on each other (as discussed on OEDAM), but whatever > intel needs has to go to oe-core. FWIW, I'm with you and I strongly oppose people dumping stuff into oe-core even if they're Intel employees :) Alex