From: Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>,
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: raj.khem@gmail.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] glibc: Upgrade to 2.41 release
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 18:29:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93297d8b-7bc7-476f-a5d3-4fe1db4b8df6@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj-fRsCoQFLFnvH9+cwvFPw8zWDvHM4eCv=3WoumAxdcxQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1450 bytes --]
On 2025-02-03 6:10 a.m., Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 at 23:37, Richard Purdie via
> lists.openembedded.org
> <richard.purdie=linuxfoundation.org@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
>> Thanks Khem, this passed in testing, the only issue was valgrind ptests
>> failing:
>>
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/61/builds/851/steps/12/logs/stdio
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/73/builds/853/steps/12/logs/stdio
>>
>> Copying Randy...
> Let me bite: it's time we drop valgrind ptest.
Okay but I'm not going to give up on the ptests completely yet
so the patch just disables ptest build, install, etc.
> It's just a non stop
> headache to support and I haven't once seen it provide actual value.
It certainly has been a headache!
I agree that most of the issues have not provided value but
I think some of the target tuning likely came out of trying to run the
ptests.
Patch being tested:
966f4c6fc5 2025-02-03 (HEAD -> master-next) valgrind: disable ptests
d392981530 2024-11-29 valgrind: update 3.23.0 -> 3.24.0 (ptest
fails, vg_regtest needs rebase)
glibc is ready to go to AB but I need to confirm that musl still builds.
I'd prefer to keep this order even if the update breaks ptests so that
if we do decide to re-enable the ptests, it's easier.
../Randy
>
> Alex
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2965 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-30 16:53 [PATCH] glibc: Upgrade to 2.41 release Khem Raj
2025-01-31 22:37 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2025-02-03 11:10 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-02-03 23:29 ` Randy MacLeod [this message]
2025-02-04 12:21 ` Martin Jansa
2025-02-04 17:04 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93297d8b-7bc7-476f-a5d3-4fe1db4b8df6@windriver.com \
--to=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox