Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] buildtools-tarball: add wic dependency into buildtools

["Changqing Li" <changqing.li@windriver.com>]

On 20/11/20 7:07 pm, Richard Purdie wrote:
> [Please note this e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
>
> On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 08:48 +0800, Changqing Li wrote:
>> fix below error:
>> wic ls ./core-image-minimal-intel-x86-64.wic
>>
>> ERROR: Can't find executable parted
>>
>> wic depend on some tools like parted/mtools/..., and we have those
>> tools in native_sysroot. so above problem can be avoided by
>> run command like wic ls imagename.wic --native-sysroot <path>
>>
>> but this cannot cover condition that usr don't have build the
>> image, the image just copy from somewhere.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
>> b/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
>> index 560b8d67b9..7783fabbf2 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
>> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ TOOLCHAIN_HOST_TASK ?= "\
>>       nativesdk-rpcsvc-proto \
>>       nativesdk-patch \
>>       nativesdk-mtools \
>> +    nativesdk-parted \
>> +    nativesdk-dosfstools \
>> +    nativesdk-gptfdisk \
>>       "
> These sound more like something which would be in buildtools-extended-
> tarball. Our rough metric for inclusion in this recipe is whether the
> tools are needed by an OE build and these are not, they're only needed
> for standalone wic usage. I'm therefore unsure whether we should be
> adding them at all.
>
> Any other opinions?
>
> Cheers,
> Richard

ok. I will send a v2 to add them into buildtools-extended-tarbal.  Thanks.

changqing

>