From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.227]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C635977CB5 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rperier) with ESMTPSA id A9616265724 To: Richard Purdie , liezhi.yang@windriver.com References: <20170405150521.19160-1-romain.perier@collabora.com> <20170405150521.19160-2-romain.perier@collabora.com> <1491478720.17200.35.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Romain Perier Message-ID: <9ea767b3-abdc-41b6-cd7b-5ffd209867e6@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 14:20:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1491478720.17200.35.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] logrotate: Bump to 3.11.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:20:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello, Le 06/04/2017 à 13:38, Richard Purdie a écrit : > On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 17:05 +0200, Romain Perier wrote: >> This commit updates the recipe to the last upstream tag. Then, as the >> tarball no longer contains the pre-generated Makefile, inherit from >> autotools >> >> [...] >> -PACKAGECONFIG ?= "${@bb.utils.filter('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl >> selinux', d)}" >> +PACKAGECONFIG ?= "\ >> + ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl', 'acl', '', d)} \ >> + ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'selinux', 'selinux', >> '', d)} \ >> +" Correct, I probably did something wrong during rebase. > I'm not sure the above should be there, it reverts someone else's > change? > > I am a little nervous of taking this at this point in the release > too... What do you think if we backport the systemd service and the systemd timer from upstream into 3.9.1 and then add support for systemd in the recipe ? (In the original patches, I have written systemd services myself) The code of logrotate would be unchanged. Regards, Romain