From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21] helo=orsmga101.jf.intel.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SjlUI-00035T-2L for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:12:26 +0200 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) by mga02.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 26 Jun 2012 23:01:13 -0700 Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so3957297wib.13 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:01:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:x-gm-message-state; bh=bXQKx+FYUOEKGxeOMV/YKyDbjP58bF5vu9ryPyTrkyk=; b=Cf++Puc/v1tOiOUYaSi8oKWH4jOUJePNy9DvVTtFSjE+S3r71Ij5En3V1RtyijErr7 Tqz482cmoKO99Cp4sHsut0mYjqwm6pt39Xjc2kECNQQB7QMcAiUPB3CM9YfbwCI394dk 4xFU3MkqDM5a2DGuCFqGbdx5EkIHsUSsaWc534+wlXqj3aexNJRQ25pBrpUaTVG10viI 2fYUvT+ltF9lBOEHb/X94SdOSgJ1R4NRM+iggMpe5LO/okixwH++uCjGHWPyb8M6+0xV iMqSumSC4oSMiF7OZ7/VSWkxrl9FO+ag+II6I1PglHnzI49joBFWJJJz7Ackx7bQlowZ eSaw== Received: by 10.180.102.36 with SMTP id fl4mr1808899wib.2.1340776871715; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elizabeth.local (35.106.2.81.in-addr.arpa. [81.2.106.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hs8sm15892062wib.10.2012.06.26.23.01.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:01:08 +0100 From: Ross Burton To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1340744566.3500.2.camel@lenny> References: <1340705423-18430-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <1340744566.3500.2.camel@lenny> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.4.2 (build 959.4) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxHO1bv2rKyKaFick9wXfTE7a+QJdUS5RnkeaUdG1SF9O16fDUNG0JUC58L28/Tj1a1yC7 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gconf.bbclass: don't register schemas in the install stage X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:12:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 22:02, Colin Walters wrote: > Even better is to have the source code check for DESTDIR, and skip gconf > bits itself; e.g.: > > http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/tree/shell/Makefile.am?h=gnome-2-28#n201 > > This patch is still useful though for components which don't check > DESTDIR, but again it's better to patch the relevant source code to do > so (or port to GSettings...). I'd prefer to use an option that the GConf autoconf macro provides over patching every module that uses GConf, as we're assured much better coverage that way. Adding the option caught every module in the Sato image but two, which were being rather minimal with their build system and the environment variable caught those (as it affects gconftool itself). Ross