From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
To: "Mikko Rapeli" <mikko.rapeli@linaro.org>,
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] oeqa selftest uboot.py: add qemu KVM test case
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 08:34:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DA6QFY5IH472.13Q6AXZPWICCU@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aDQqIZgXepLP3xXD@nuoska>
On Mon May 26, 2025 at 10:45 AM CEST, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 05:16:58PM +0300, Mikko Rapeli via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 03:15:51PM +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
>> > On Thu May 22, 2025 at 3:41 PM CEST, Mikko Rapeli via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>> > > Add a test case to boot target system via u-boot
>> > > using qemu with KVM. This was broken recently
>> > > and workaround proposed to u-boot. Test case
>> > > works with genericarm64 and qemuarm64 target machines
>> > > compiled and tested on aarch64 build host with KVM
>> > > support.
>> > >
>> > > Test execution time with full sstate cache is
>> > > around 170 seconds. qemu boot itself takes just
>> > > a few seconds to full userspace.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@linaro.org>
>> > > ---
>> >
>> > Hi Mikko,
>> >
>> > I saw your other mail saying you will make an update, but as I had
>> > already picked these patches, here is the build result: the selftest is
>> > failing on armhost:
>> >
>> > ---
>> > 2025-05-23 08:50:18,542 - oe-selftest - INFO - uboot.UBootTest.test_boot_uboot_kvm_to_full_target (subunit.RemotedTestCase)
>> > 2025-05-23 08:50:18,543 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ERROR
>> > ...
>> > QEMU 10.0.0 monitor - type 'help' for more information
>> > (qemu)
>> > Waiting at most 1000 seconds for login banner (05/23/25 08:33:29)
>> > Connection from 127.0.0.1:43786
>> > Target didn't reach login banner in 1000 seconds (05/23/25 08:50:12)
>> > Last 25 lines of login console (1721):
>> > Scanning bootdev 'virtio-blk#36.bootdev':
>> > Scanning bootdev 'virtio-net#32.bootdev':
>> > BOOTP broadcast 1
>> > ...
>> > BOOTP broadcast 17
>> >
>> > Retry time exceeded; starting again
>> > No more bootdevs
>> > --- ----------- ------ -------- ---- ------------------------ ----------------
>> > (1 bootflow, 1 valid)
>> > =>
>> > ...
>> > RuntimeError: core-image-minimal - FAILED to start qemu - check the task log and the boot log
>> > ---
>> >
>> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/23/builds/1749
>>
>> Thanks, I will take a look. Boot to u-boot seems to ok so KVM is working on
>> the aarch64 build machine but something in wic image ESP partition detection is not
>> working in the same way as on my aarch64 build machine and qemuarm64 and
>> genericarm64 configs.
>>
>> I will compare the runqemu and qemu-system-aarch64 arguments to figure out what is
>> different.
>>
>> One problem I thought I solved was to change from virtio scsi to virtio blk emulation
>> but that seems to be effecttive albeit with a warning:
>>
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/api/v2/logs/2468510/raw_inline
>>
>> runqemu - WARNING - Unknown QB_DRIVE_TYPE: vd
>> runqemu - WARNING - Failed to figure out drive type, consider define or fix QB_DRIVE_TYPE
>> runqemu - WARNING - Trying to use virtio block drive
>>
>> u-boot defconfig does not have scsi support but virtio blk works for disk with ESP
>> partition in fat format.
>
> I reviewed the runqemu and qemu-system-aarch64 arguments but could not see major differences.
> One difference is that autobuilder runs with tap and I with slirp networking, but that
> should not affect rootfs/ESP partition detection in u-boot. I've sent out v4 now.
> If this still fails on autobuilder, then I'd need know what config fragments
> are applied. I've configured qemuarm64 and genericarm64 with
> ". oe-init-build-env" and then added TEST_RUNQEMUPARAMS += "slirp"
> and SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS = "" to conf/local.conf. Maybe autobuilder
> scripts add something more.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Mikko
Hi Mikko,
Thanks for the new version, but I confirm it still fails.
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/23/builds/1772
About the configuration, I believe everything is there:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/23/builds/1772/steps/14/logs/stdio
But anyway, here is the configuration on the worker:
$ cat conf/auto.conf
MACHINE = "qemuarm64"
DISTRO = "poky"
SDKMACHINE = "aarch64"
PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_rpm"
DL_DIR = '/srv/autobuilder/valkyrie.yocto.io/current_sources'
SSTATE_DIR ?= '/srv/autobuilder/valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/sstate'
RPM_GPG_SIGN_CHUNK = '1'
IMAGE_INSTALL:append = ' ssh-pregen-hostkeys'
SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS = ''
BB_HASHSERVE = 'wss://hashserv-eu.yoctoproject.org/ws'
OE_FRAGMENTS += 'core/yocto-autobuilder/autobuilder core/yocto-autobuilder/autobuilder-resource-constraints'
local.conf is unmodified (local.conf.sample).
Best regards,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-27 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-22 13:41 [PATCH v3 1/3] u-boot: disable CONFIG_BLOBLIST on genericarm64 and qemuarm64 Mikko Rapeli
2025-05-22 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] qemuarm64.conf: allow overriding QB_OPT_APPEND Mikko Rapeli
2025-05-22 13:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] oeqa selftest uboot.py: add qemu KVM test case Mikko Rapeli
2025-05-23 13:15 ` [OE-core] " Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-05-23 14:16 ` Mikko Rapeli
[not found] ` <18422DAC420B1606.3062@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-05-26 8:45 ` Mikko Rapeli
2025-05-27 6:34 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand [this message]
2025-05-27 7:17 ` Mikko Rapeli
2025-05-27 7:43 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-05-27 8:54 ` Mikko Rapeli
2025-05-27 9:37 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-05-27 9:55 ` Mikko Rapeli
2025-05-27 9:36 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-05-27 9:52 ` Mikko Rapeli
[not found] ` <1841DD2A7A0AA7E1.3062@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-05-23 9:42 ` Mikko Rapeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DA6QFY5IH472.13Q6AXZPWICCU@bootlin.com \
--to=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=mikko.rapeli@linaro.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox