From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
To: "Tondo, Stefano" <stefano.tondo.ext@siemens.com>,
"Stefano Tondo" <stondo@gmail.com>,
"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: "Marko, Peter" <Peter.Marko@siemens.com>,
"Freihofer, Adrian" <adrian.freihofer@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2] spdx30_tasks: Fix SPDX_CUSTOM_ANNOTATION_VARS implementation
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:52:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DECSILYBSPUH.3Q482LTJ8SAD9@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS4PR10MB51507A3160F4AD577CD35ED4ACD7A@AS4PR10MB5150.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Wed Nov 19, 2025 at 1:33 PM CET, Stefano Tondo wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Weird, this time oe-selftest was passing. Anything else I need to check locally to make sure it is working properly?
>
> 2025-11-19 12:25:28,520 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_custom_annotation_vars (spdx.SPDX30Check.test_custom_annotation_vars)
> 2025-11-19 12:26:22,548 - oe-selftest - INFO - Found ANNOTATION1: ANNOTATION1=TestAnnotation1
> 2025-11-19 12:26:22,548 - oe-selftest - INFO - Found ANNOTATION2: ANNOTATION2=TestAnnotation2
> 2025-11-19 12:26:22,549 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok
> 2025-11-19 12:26:27,823 - oe-selftest - INFO - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2025-11-19 12:26:27,823 - oe-selftest - INFO - Ran 1 test in 59.471s
> 2025-11-19 12:26:27,823 - oe-selftest - INFO - OK
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,996 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS:
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,996 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - spdx.SPDX30Check.test_custom_annotation_vars: PASSED (54.03s)
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,997 - oe-selftest - INFO - SUMMARY:
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,997 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest () - Ran 1 test in 59.471s
> 2025-11-19 12:26:32,997 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest - OK - All required tests passed (successes=1, skipped=0, failures=0, errors=0)
>
> Best regards,
> Stefano
>
Hi Stefano,
I was able to reproduce this locally, using:
- oecore: https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-ci-archive/tag/?h=oecore/autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/a-full-2740
- bitbake: https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-ci-archive/tag/?h=bitbake/autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/a-full-2740
in local.conf:
MACHINE = "qemux86-64"
SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS = ""
An then:
oe-selftest -r spdx.SPDX30Check.test_custom_annotation_vars
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 13:04 [OE-core][PATCH v2] spdx30_tasks: Fix SPDX_CUSTOM_ANNOTATION_VARS implementation Stefano Tondo
2025-11-19 9:10 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2025-11-19 12:33 ` Tondo, Stefano
2025-11-19 15:52 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DECSILYBSPUH.3Q482LTJ8SAD9@bootlin.com \
--to=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=Peter.Marko@siemens.com \
--cc=adrian.freihofer@siemens.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=stefano.tondo.ext@siemens.com \
--cc=stondo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox