Re: [Whinlatter][PATCH v2] binutils: Upgrade to 2.45.1 release

["Yoann Congal" <yoann.congal@smile.fr>]

On Tue Feb 3, 2026 at 5:04 AM CET, Hemanth.KumarMD wrote:
> From: Hemanth Kumar M D <Hemanth.KumarMD@windriver.com>
>
> Brings binutils 2.45.1 release and followed by latest commits from 2.45 branch:
>
> 12d0a1dbc1b i386: Add GLIBC_ABI_GNU_TLS dependency only if used
> e3a18893e1c LoongArch: Use more appropriate assertions for the relocation of TLS LE
> b136efd10a7 Re: dlltool memory leaks
> b4bde11f310 ld: Don't use -mdirect-extern-access for LoongArch
> a813a6a6ea0 Re-enable development on the 2.45 branch
> 48324fde1e2 (tag: binutils-2_45_1) This is the 2.45.1 release
> ab776bc8685 lto: Set plugin_format to bfd_plugin_no only if known_used is set
> cec7ab85f24 aarch64: gas: Allow movprfx with fmmla and bfscale [PR gas/33562]
> 0b040187894 aarch64, gas: Relax Armv9.6-A mandatory feature set
> 4df2be75910 i386: Add GLIBC_ABI_GNU_TLS version dependency
> 71c1de4b0c8 x86-64: Add GLIBC_ABI_DT_X86_64_PLT version dependency
> b0fe5c23780 x86: Add GLIBC_ABI_GNU2_TLS version dependency
> d5945a221ff x86: Copy non_got_ref_without_indirect_extern_access
>
> Testing Results:
> +-------------------------------+--------+--------+------+
> | Metric                        | Before | After  | Diff |
> +-------------------------------+--------+--------+------+
> | Expected passes               | 317    | 317    | 0    |
> | Unexpected failures           | 1      | 1      | 0    |
> | Untested testcases            | 5      | 5      | 0    |
> | Unsupported tests             | 8      | 8      | 0    |
> +-------------------------------+--------+--------+------+
>
> ld/configure is regenerated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemanth Kumar M D <Hemanth.KumarMD@windriver.com>
> ---
>  .../binutils/binutils-2.45.inc                |    6 +-
>  ...-system-directories-when-cross-linki.patch |   38 +-
>  .../binutils/0008-Use-libtool-2.4.patch       | 1827 ++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 836 insertions(+), 1035 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
> index 16a63cabc5..6e0d8cfa7d 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.45.inc
> @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "\
>  
>  # When upgrading to next major release, ensure that there is no trailing .0, so
>  # that upstream version check can work correctly.
> -PV = "2.45"
> -CVE_VERSION = "2.45"
> +PV = "2.45.1+git"
> +CVE_VERSION = "2.45.1"
>  SRCBRANCH ?= "binutils-2_45-branch"
>  
>  UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "binutils-(?P<pver>\d+_(\d_?)*)"
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ UPSTREAM_CHECK_GITTAGREGEX = "binutils-(?P<pver>\d+_(\d_?)*)"
>  CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-7545] = "cpe-stable-backport: fix available in used git hash"
>  CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-7546] = "cpe-stable-backport: fix available in used git hash"
>  
> -SRCREV ?= "2f028c6bb163a045db95439fb92e1dcbc919413c"
> +SRCREV ?= "b1300fdc25572ab9f523249aea2363f844f47957"

Hello,

Sorry, I did not noticed earlier but that would put whinlatter ahead of
master on the binutils recipes (there is at least one "meaningful" commit).
Can you send this upgrade to master first? (And request a backport after
that)

Also, you may want to send the backport request for the 2.45.1 upgrade
on master:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=ef0f7ed49bb53380c218dd529bcf25c5b6681223

Thanks!

-- 
Yoann Congal