From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498B1EA812D for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc01-g2.22117.1770736814581775274 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:20:15 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=eLOdMBV4; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.246.85.4, mailfrom: mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755CA4E40BFF; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0AF606BD; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id C047510B920E4; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:20:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1770736811; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=fOqMS76aacyOBFUy7aAXhPXD82B6XoicMheQT1dc9BM=; b=eLOdMBV4Z5DTME5TXIzra6CXJ/yzu5HpepyRQlWXIsdMLipmUFk0pm8ieqNYUV7p7tvNx1 jOeyHPZSpA9lDVQxyJ+6ThUtz3+OsdhfNp6galIwvVYIsaq9MRPrEDZeLaoH58emylyidQ BoXsiudr0zhC66kKpzHXVP6QKyP46X3WRhO2G6BoTQzdGDHgIqy8H/LVVtnG/yWqxwFzTX kD4Yi+lDwr6ErJQeZpXb+JpnBl5TOGP2SDkzgBLI7120neqmKtWgcrZ+DhReknryX4obUg msiRRMfHMD17APWTjXc4i8Q1g9k6PADNtZ1aVmVVl+CGUOjGqC3KCGCRWx4OdQ== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 16:20:10 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" To: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/13] kernel-yocto: 6.18 updates and 6.12/6.16 removal Cc: "Richard Purdie" , =?utf-8?q?Jan-Simon_M=C3=B6ller?= , X-Mailer: aerc 0.19.0-0-gadd9e15e475d References: <20260206202732.1080699-1-bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:20:25 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/230909 On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 3:18 PM CET, Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.o= rg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 9:08=E2=80=AFAM Mathieu Dubois-Briand < > mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com> wrote: > >> Just a note about the process while we are at it: picking this series >> was not straightforward, at least with b4: it got confused by patches >> 1-4 appearing twice (1 oe-core, 1 meta-yocto). It was not a big deal and >> I have no suggestion for a better process so far, but it would be >> helpful if patch numbers were unique. >> > > My export scripts are doing that numbering on purpose, so I can definitel= y > change it if it helps the picking of them. > > I can also just send them to the two separate lists, but I'm trying to > simulate > the unified series so that we don't miss coordinating between the two > lists (and that's why the numbering is individual). > > I do have a "flat mode" in the tools, and that would just number them fro= m > 0-N through the entire series. > > I'm open to either option. I can send 0-N to the single list, or do the t= wo > 0-N sends on separate lists and let the coordination happen on your end > between the two. > > Just let me know which you prefer and I'll switch to it. > > Bruce > I do not have any strong opinion here. Having two separate 0-N series on the two separate lists is probably the easiest one to pick on my side, but I can understand the advantage of a single series to make sure all patches are picked in coordination. A single series is also a working solution. So I will let others share their opinions. Thanks, Mathieu --=20 Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com