public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yoann Congal" <yoann.congal@smile.fr>
To: <mark.hatle@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Paul Barker" <paul@pbarker.dev>,
	"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
	"openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Recipes which should always be upgraded on stable branches
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:24:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DGOS9G19GT7A.RNNHZA4OJNQN@smile.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <145e7167-d654-4505-bcf2-a481f35258e9@kernel.crashing.org>

On Thu Feb 26, 2026 at 12:50 AM CET, Mark Hatle via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> On 2/25/26 11:44 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I've been briefly discussing stable branch update policy with Yoann.
>> There's a few recipes in openembedded-core which I would like to propose
>> that we always update to the latest version on LTS and stable branches.
>> These are recipes typically providing data that is expected to change
>> over time, with little or no code.
>> 
>> You could say ca-certificates is already covered by the fact that
>> security fixes are acceptable for example, but a clearer policy would be
>> better.
>> 
>> Any policy change will go to the TSC for approval, the goal here is to
>> get some review and input so that a concrete proposal can be put
>> forward.
>> 
>> The recipes that come to my mind are:
>> 
>> - ca-certificates: To allow access to HTTPS resources we need to keep
>>    these up-to-date.
>> 
>>      - Keeping this up-to-date is common practice in other distros.

Agreed but since CAs can be removed from the list, there is a
probability for breakage. We should acknowledge that. By spelling out
the CA addition/removal in the release notes maybe?

>> - tzdata: To stay up to date with timezone or daylight savings changes.
>> 
>>      - Debian takes upgrades to this on stable branches
>>        (see https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tzdata).
>
> I agree completely for the above two items.  Keeping these current is really 
> important and history has shown that updating them doesn't cause issues.
>
>
> The one below I don't have any experience with, so no opinion.
>
>> - mobile-broadband-provider-info: To stay up to date with provider
>>    changes.
>> 
>>      - The README file for this project says "The Package contains only
>>        informational files so it's safe for distributions to grab updates
>>        even during feature freeze and maintenance stages."
>> 
>> What opinions do other folks have?

I also agree with updating those. I've looked at
mobile-broadband-provider-info for a recent stable upgrade and merged
it.

>> Are there any other recipes we should include in this list?

In addition of the wireless-regdb suggestion from Ankur, maybe we should
consider hwdata:
> hwdata contains various hardware identification and configuration data,
> such as the pci.ids and usb.ids databases.
I have no direct experience with it but it does seem to match this list.

>> Best regards,

Regards,
-- 
Yoann Congal
Smile ECS



  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-26  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25 17:44 Recipes which should always be upgraded on stable branches Paul Barker
2026-02-25 19:04 ` [OE-core] " Ankur Tyagi
2026-02-25 23:50 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Mark Hatle
2026-02-26  9:24   ` Yoann Congal [this message]
2026-02-26 11:37 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2026-02-26 11:49   ` Richard Purdie
2026-02-26 13:10     ` Nicolas Dechesne
2026-02-26 13:58       ` Richard Purdie
2026-04-30 21:37         ` Ricardo Salveti
2026-03-06 10:29 ` Yoann Congal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DGOS9G19GT7A.RNNHZA4OJNQN@smile.fr \
    --to=yoann.congal@smile.fr \
    --cc=mark.hatle@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox