From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC325FD8FF2 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc02-g2.76673.1772129699183912406 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:15:00 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=dkim header.b=I7KGuKkQ; spf=pass (domain: bootlin.com, ip: 185.246.85.4, mailfrom: mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com) Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA624E4123C; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3165FDE9; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 4C6EB103686E1; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 19:14:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1772129696; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=hVaCCahjWBL/+r4Abn9Slt5yoWeQQ7czUUJvndRXztA=; b=I7KGuKkQu+ZPwrmCXmozV7RojGhrag4oRbbDQIwJRjJAlMG4fIafTvZ/wmBJS/VAVXMnot q3kMhKBgjTmhK495RFja8egT0iUL2B/hNDsEMGgCpMa1DrXNi/RyzHy573MqKmNQwES3m3 pX1dXo1/NdWkrIRuzj6f1a+5lHLCSJZVw/ijrvQ+b/i8+Ubdu/uZznQOyw0qg4CGZBwS8X WpT7jGC7BSKZyLOn2OXwlxvvId0CJzw1h2YQuB+PiRrSlneIS595g6Pn+a2AXkYcmxMo1k LD/kHgtpmmMYh0IhaZv2uLOAFRNXdLwvvD6y/tABs30T5FpzCWYMI/U82ZmA4Q== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 19:14:51 +0100 Message-Id: To: "Randolph Sapp" , , , , Subject: Re: [oe-core][PATCHv15 1/6] emptty: add version 0.15.0 Cc: , , , , , From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" X-Mailer: aerc 0.19.0-0-gadd9e15e475d References: <20260203012028.4008229-1-rs@ti.com> <20260203012028.4008229-2-rs@ti.com> In-Reply-To: X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:15:02 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/232059 On Thu Feb 26, 2026 at 7:09 PM CET, Randolph Sapp wrote: > On Thu Feb 12, 2026 at 10:45 AM CST, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote: >> On Tue Feb 3, 2026 at 2:20 AM CET, Randolph Sapp via lists.openembedded.= org wrote: >>> From: Randolph Sapp >>> >>> Add emptty, a "Dead simple CLI Display Manager on TTY". This is a >>> relatively lightweight display manager that supports x11 as well as >>> wayland through both a CLI and an automatic login mechanism. >>> >>> This can effectively replace the custom init scripts for both x11 >>> (xserver-nodm-init) and wayland (weston-init) with a single tool with >>> more verbose logging capabilities. >>> >>> This is split into two recipes. The emptty package provides the binary >>> and various agnostic configs while the emptty-conf package provides the >>> default configuration for the application itself. This RPROVIDES >>> virtual-emptty-conf, allowing other recipes to provide their own >>> configurations to override the default behavior. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp >>> --- >> >> Hi Randolph, >> >> This patch has been in my branch for a week now, but we are seeing some >> intermittent reproducibility issues. >> >> I opened a bugzilla entry by error, as for a second I thought this patch >> was merged, so details can be found here: >> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16171 >> >> Diffoscope output is here: >> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260212-ssslvz= 6_/packages/diff-html/ >> >> Can you have a look at what is going wrong please? >> >> Thanks, >> Mathieu > > Now that the source epoch has been addressed [1] should I resubmit this v= ersion > of the series? I won't be changing anything since the RFC [2] for the oth= er > issue reported on this series didn't get any comments. > > [1] https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta?id=3D70a74= fa2bd9c374bd07b89b426a86991b1d93a5f > [2] https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/117730556 > > - Randolph Hi Randolph, No the action is on my side, I just forgot to take back your series when I took the source epoch fix. It will be part of my next build, thanks for the ping. Thanks, Mathieu --=20 Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com