From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
To: <wangmy@fujitsu.com>, <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] lttng-tools: upgrade 2.14.1 -> 2.15.0
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:21:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHAV7DUCN3RY.302UM677B9ZL2@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323034243.2150-1-wangmy@fujitsu.com>
On Mon Mar 23, 2026 at 4:42 AM CET, wangmy via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> From: Wang Mingyu <wangmy@fujitsu.com>
>
> disable-tests2.patch
> refresshed for 2.15.0
>
> 0001-tests-do-not-strip-a-helper-library.patch
> removed since it's not available in 2.15.0
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu <wangmy@fujitsu.com>
> ---
Hi Wang,
Thanks for the upgrade.
We also have musl build issues here:
ERROR: lttng-tools-2.15.0-r0 do_compile: Execution of '/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/musl-qemux86-64/build/build/tmp/work/x86-64-v3-poky-linux-musl/lttng-tools/2.15.0/temp/run.do_compile.3424918' failed with exit code 1
...
| In file included from /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/musl-qemux86-64/build/build/tmp/work/x86-64-v3-poky-linux-musl/lttng-tools/2.15.0/recipe-sysroot/usr/include/fcntl.h:22,
| from /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/musl-qemux86-64/build/build/tmp/work/x86-64-v3-poky-linux-musl/lttng-tools/2.15.0/recipe-sysroot/usr/include/sys/epoll.h:11,
| from ../../../sources/lttng-tools-2.15.0/src/common/poller.hpp:19,
| from ../../../sources/lttng-tools-2.15.0/src/common/poller.cpp:8:
| ../../../sources/lttng-tools-2.15.0/src/common/poller.cpp: In lambda function:
| ../../../sources/lttng-tools-2.15.0/src/common/poller.cpp:61:57: error: expected id-expression before numeric constant
| 61 | const auto epoll_fd = ::epoll_create1(::EPOLL_CLOEXEC);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| In file included from /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/musl-qemux86-64/build/build/tmp/work/x86-64-v3-poky-linux-musl/lttng-tools/2.15.0/recipe-sysroot/usr/include/fcntl.h:22,
| from /srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/musl-qemux86-64/build/build/tmp/work/x86-64-v3-poky-linux-musl/lttng-tools/2.15.0/recipe-sysroot/usr/include/sys/timerfd.h:9,
| from ../../../sources/lttng-tools-2.15.0/src/common/timerfd.hpp:14,
| from ../../../sources/lttng-tools-2.15.0/src/common/timerfd.cpp:10:
| ../../../sources/lttng-tools-2.15.0/src/common/timerfd.hpp:22:40: error: expected id-expression before numeric constant
| 22 | explicit timerfd(int flags = ::TFD_CLOEXEC);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~
| At global scope:
| cc1plus: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-gnu-folding-constant' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
| cc1plus: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-incomplete-setjmp-declaration' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
| cc1plus: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-gnu-folding-constant' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
| cc1plus: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-incomplete-setjmp-declaration' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/3/builds/3496
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/6/builds/3463
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/111/builds/2174
Also, I believe we have some reproducibility error:
AssertionError: The following deb packages are different and not in exclusion list:
/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/deb/./x86-64-v3/lttng-tools-ptest_2.15.0-r0_amd64.deb
The following ipk packages are different and not in exclusion list:
/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/ipk/./x86-64-v3/lttng-tools-ptest_2.15.0-r0_x86-64-v3.ipk
The following rpm packages are different and not in exclusion list:
/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/reproducible/build/build-st/reproducibleB-extended/tmp/deploy/rpm/./x86_64_v3/lttng-tools-ptest-2.15.0-r0.x86_64_v3.rpm
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/37/builds/3670
https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/repro-fail/oe-reproducible-20260324-9c_hk1xz/packages/diff-html/
Can you have a look at the issue?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 3:42 [OE-core] [PATCH] lttng-tools: upgrade 2.14.1 -> 2.15.0 Wang Mingyu
2026-03-24 8:21 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-27 12:09 Wang Mingyu
2026-03-31 10:06 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHAV7DUCN3RY.302UM677B9ZL2@bootlin.com \
--to=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=wangmy@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox