RE: [PATCH] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-tools: upgrade 2.14.1 -> 2.15.0

Mingyu Wang (Fujitsu)
2026-04-13T10:24:48Z

Understood. Can I add PR = "r1" to the bb file? I will remove this line during the next version upgrade.

--
Best Regards
---------------------------------------------------
Wang Mingyu
FUJITSU NANJING SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (FNST)
No.6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China
TEL：+86+25-86630566--8568
COINS: 79988548
FAX: +86+25-83317685
MAIL: wangmy@fujitsu.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2026 4:13 PM
> To: Wang, Mingyu/王 鸣瑜 <wangmy@fujitsu.com>;
> openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [OE-core] [PATCH v2] lttng-tools: upgrade 2.14.1 -> 2.15.0
>
> On Mon Apr 13, 2026 at 9:13 AM CEST, wangmy via lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
> > Thank you for running the tests. However, looking at the build log for build
> #3471, I noticed that the sstate summary shows:
> >
> > Sstate summary: Wanted 5 Local 5 Mirrors 0 Missed 0 Current 440
> >
> > This indicates that only 5 tasks were actually rebuilt, and lttng-ust was most
> likely served from the sstate cache rather than rebuilt with the patch applied.
> The failure output is also identical to build #3450 (before the patch), which
> further confirms that the updated lttng-ust package was not used during
> testing.
> >
> > Could you please invalidate the lttng-ust sstate cache and trigger a clean
> rebuild before re-running the ptest image? I believe the patch is correct and the
> test should pass once lttng-ust is rebuilt from scratch.
> >
> > These ptests all pass in my qemuarm64 and qemux86-64 environments.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> Hi Wang,
>
> No sorry, I can't do that on the autobuilder. If we need to invalidate the cache,
> we will probably have to increase the PR value of the recipe.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> --
> Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com