From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
To: "Gavini, Sumanth" <sumanth.gavini@windriver.com>,
"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: "alex.kanavin@gmail.com" <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>,
"mattware@cisco.com" <mattware@cisco.com>,
"esparlin@cisco.com" <esparlin@cisco.com>,
"peter.marko@siemens.com" <peter.marko@siemens.com>,
"MacLeod, Randy" <Randy.MacLeod@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v10 0/8] rpm: 4.20.1 -> 6.0.2
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:08:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKATWSO7B1U7.IDPWKARHM1IG@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25b06551-b8d5-43d8-a494-217ff2ad8116@windriver.com>
On Wed Jul 29, 2026 at 3:25 AM CEST, Sumanth Gavini wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I tested the v10 patch on the top of master branch and couldn't
> reproduce the autobuilder-reported failures on my local machine. Could
> you please check again and confirm if the issue is still present?
>
> These are the bitbake recipes I tested
>
> 4248:
> -bitbake core-image-sato core-image-sato-sdk core-image-minimal
> core-image-full-cmdline core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk -k //pass
> -bitbake core-image-sato-sdk:do_rootfs //pass
>
> 4228:
> -bitbake core-image-sato core-image-sato-sdk core-image-minimal
> core-image-full-cmdline core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk -k //pass
> -bitbake core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk //pass
>
> 4210:
> -core-image-minimal-dev:do_rootfs //pass
> -bitbake core-image-sato core-image-sato-sdk core-image-minimal
> core-image-minimal-dev core-image-full-cmdline
> core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk core-image-minimal:do_populate_sdk_ext
> core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk_ext -k //pass
>
> 4211:
> -bitbake core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk //pass
> -bitbake core-image-sato core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk
> core-image-minimal:do_populate_sdk_ext -k // pass
>
> 4394/4213/4458:
> -bitbake core-image-minimal:do_rootfs //pass
>
> All of the above completed successfully on my local setup.
>
> Thanks,
Hi Sumanth,
I did reproduce the first failure locally.
I'm using these tags for bitbake/oecore, to get the same version as
my autobuilder build:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-ci-archive/tag/?h=bitbake/autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/a-full-4309
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-ci-archive/tag/?h=oecore/autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/a-full-4309
In my local.conf, I have the default template, with these additions:
SDKMACHINE = "x86_64"
PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_rpm package_deb package_ipk"
INHERIT += 'image-buildinfo'
IMAGE_BUILDINFO_VARS:append = ' IMAGE_BASENAME IMAGE_NAME'
IMAGE_INSTALL:append = ' ssh-pregen-hostkeys'
SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS = ''
OEQA_TESTDISPLAY = ':1'
EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES ?= 'allow-empty-password empty-root-password allow-root-login'
OE_FRAGMENTS += 'machine/qemux86-64 distro/poky'
Then, both of these builds are failing:
bitbake core-image-minimal-dev
bitbake core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 22:55 [PATCH v10 0/8] rpm: 4.20.1 -> 6.0.2 Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:55 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] package_rpm.bbclass: Drop external dependency generator to support rpm 6 Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:55 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] package_rpm.bbclass: Define _lib and _libdir for rpmbuild Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:55 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] lib/oe/package.py: Don't add ldconfig_postinst_fragment for glibc or musl Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:55 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] lib/oe/package.py: Filter out /usr/bin/pkg-config file dependency Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:55 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] lib/oe/package.py: Don't redirect stderr Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:55 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] target-sdk-provides-dummy: Add pkg-config to DUMMYPROVIDES Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:55 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] rpm: 4.20.1 -> 6.0.2 Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-27 22:56 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] libarchive: Make it work with rpm 6 Sumanth Gavini
2026-07-28 15:18 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] rpm: 4.20.1 -> 6.0.2 Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-07-28 19:33 ` [OE-core] " Gavini, Sumanth
[not found] ` <18C68B13D5EABE33.1674579@lists.openembedded.org>
2026-07-29 1:25 ` Gavini, Sumanth
2026-07-29 6:08 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand [this message]
2026-07-29 7:31 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-07-29 8:15 ` Mathieu Dubois-Briand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DKATWSO7B1U7.IDPWKARHM1IG@bootlin.com \
--to=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=Randy.MacLeod@windriver.com \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=esparlin@cisco.com \
--cc=mattware@cisco.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=peter.marko@siemens.com \
--cc=sumanth.gavini@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox