From: Benjamin Robin <benjamin.robin@bootlin.com>
To: "Marko, Peter" <Peter.Marko@siemens.com>
Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sudo: set status of CVE-2025-64170 and CVE-2025-64517
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:12:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <RRV3rhtPRj-XxHaMgbEl5A@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS1PR10MB56977CF6AB8F681734EAD75DFD292@AS1PR10MB5697.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Sunday, April 26, 2026 at 9:17 PM, Marko, Peter wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marko, Peter (FT D EU SK BFS1) <Peter.Marko@siemens.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2026 8:50 PM
> > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > Cc: Marko, Peter (FT D EU SK BFS1) <Peter.Marko@siemens.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/6] sudo: set status of CVE-2025-64170 and CVE-2025-64517
> >
> > From: Peter Marko <peter.marko@siemens.com>
> >
> > These CVEs are for sudo-rs, not sudo.
> > It can be easily deducted from first word in NVD descripotion.
> > Also cvelistV5 product is "sudo-re".
> >
> > It looks line that new version of sbom-cve-check matches product with
> > startsWith instead of equals?
>
> Benjamin, any idea about this topic?
Yes, sadly the CPE of sudo-rs is trifectatech:sudo.
Why this is the official CPE of sudo-rs, I don't know...
What it is happening:
- From https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2025-64170
we extract vendor and product name, then we look the products database
which is built in sbom-cve-check.
- The returned CPE are "memorysafety:sudo", "trifectatech:sudo"
- Then we check if the CPE in the SBOM matches with these CPE.
Currently sudo is declared as: *:sudo, which matches trifectatech:sudo.
The easy fix is to declare the proper CPE of sudo using CVE_PRODUCT,
which should be set to "sudo_project:sudo".
This behavior is documented here:
https://sbom-cve-check.readthedocs.io/en/latest/design.html#find-applicable-cve
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Marko <peter.marko@siemens.com>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.17p2.bb | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.17p2.bb b/meta/recipes-
> > extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.17p2.bb
> > index d6ee881f8c..12f81c5d4a 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.17p2.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.9.17p2.bb
> > @@ -60,3 +60,6 @@ RDEPENDS:${PN} += "${SUDO_PACKAGES}"
> >
> > FILES:${PN}-sudo = "${bindir}/sudo ${bindir}/sudoedit"
> > FILES:${PN}-lib = "${localstatedir} ${libexecdir} ${sysconfdir} ${libdir}
> > ${nonarch_libdir}"
> > +
> > +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-64170] = "cpe-incorrect: this CVE is for sudo-rs"
> > +CVE_STATUS[CVE-2025-64517] = "cpe-incorrect: this CVE is for sudo-rs"
>
--
Benjamin Robin, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-26 18:50 [PATCH 1/6] sudo: set status of CVE-2025-64170 and CVE-2025-64517 Peter Marko
2026-04-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] cargo: set status of CVE-2023-40030 Peter Marko
2026-04-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] cargo: set CVE_PRODUCT Peter Marko
2026-04-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] git: set status of 5 CVEs Peter Marko
2026-04-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] ovmf: set status for 7 CVEs Peter Marko
2026-04-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] ffmpeg: set status for 5 CVEs Peter Marko
2026-04-27 7:44 ` Benjamin Robin
2026-04-27 10:07 ` Marko, Peter
2026-04-27 10:10 ` [PATCH v2] ffmpeg: set status for 4 CVEs Peter Marko
2026-04-27 16:40 ` Marko, Peter
2026-04-26 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] sudo: set status of CVE-2025-64170 and CVE-2025-64517 Marko, Peter
2026-04-27 7:12 ` Benjamin Robin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=RRV3rhtPRj-XxHaMgbEl5A@bootlin.com \
--to=benjamin.robin@bootlin.com \
--cc=Peter.Marko@siemens.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox