From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E748771B50 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v7LFvKen019885 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:57:20 -0700 Received: from server.local (128.224.21.62) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:57:20 -0700 To: Richard Purdie References: <1503330934.32591.64.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Bruce Ashfield Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:57:19 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1503330934.32591.64.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:57:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2017-08-21 11:55 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 22:58 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> Here's the collected set of kernel changes that are ready for the M3 >> builds. >> >> We have some kernel meta data changes: >> >>   kernel-yocto: configuration updates: x86 features >>   linux-yocto/4.1: fix fsl-ls10xx sdhci >>   linux-yocto: add usb-net configs by default >> >> Some bug fixes: >> >>   kernel-yocto: ensure that only valid BSPs are built >>   linux-yocto/4.10: CVE & misc fixes >> >> And the important changes are the addition of the 4.12 kernel + libc headers >> and the removal of the 4.1 kernel. >> >> I also have some -stable updates queued for the active kernel versions, but >> they will come out once this series has made it into the tree, since I'm >> trying to isolate any 4.12 issues from other -stable updates. >> >> I built and booted all the qemu targets for 4.12, and have built for >> core-image-sato, core-image-kernel-dev, glibc and muslc for all of the >> architectures. My testing didn't pick up any regressions, but I was battling >> some other build errors (non kernel related) during my testing, so I can >> never be 100% sure. >> >> I've sent patches to poky to remove/bump any references to the 4.1 kernel >> .. if I've missed any, I'm sure people will shout. > > Thanks for the other fix, not got that tested yet as builds are still > ongoing. However there appears to be a perf issue: > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-deb-non-deb/builds/429/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-packagemanagers/builds/77/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-packagemanagers/builds/77/steps/BuildImages_1/logs/stdio > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-packagemanagers/builds/77/steps/BuildImages_2/logs/stdio > [and so on] > Again, I'm not going to be much good on fixing this. I of course have built (and run perf on target) for all the architectures or I never would have sent the pull request. I'll see if I can find something wrong on what my building was producing, but otherwise, I have no way to reproduce it. Bruce > Cheers, > > Richard > > >