From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kmu-office.ch (mail.kmu-office.ch [178.209.48.109]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97886BCD6 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 22:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.kmu-office.ch (unknown [IPv6:2a02:418:6a02::a3]) by mail.kmu-office.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ECC95C09C4 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 00:20:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agner.ch; s=dkim; t=1570314038; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CMys0sGa/4IbOVdt2rqP6hI6hITMl76Ct67AdMYZIG4=; b=xLMhZ89nJXC3N5Aq1RmBUcvHJdmpEeW/EKalQM2xELGKSTFKBZiZRsyeiuXgEnDsOrDX7G y4npdC07KJUIyhgwL0gAslUBm3m982jPo9MxLW6IMKtNN4DWePeL+cpiyUKwx5CowTShGc qYhHpwW5LFh0zIVL7rmgEsy/q0GFA2I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 00:20:38 +0200 From: Stefan Agner To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <20191005213159.2334.53447@do> References: <20191005210834.28170-1-stefan@agner.ch> <20191005213159.2334.53447@do> Message-ID: X-Sender: stefan@agner.ch User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIHpyYW06IHByb3Blcmx5IGltcGxlbWVudCBzeXN0ZW1kIHNlcnZpY2U=?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 22:20:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, As an on and off contributor I rely on the instructions in the OE wiki. Unfortunately the example for meta-oe is just next of an example using the openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org. Maybe the second example should contain the correct address for meta-oe as well? http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded#Sending_patches -- Stefan On 2019-10-05 23:31, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: zram: properly implement systemd service > Revision: 1 > URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/20315/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > > Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is > an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed > series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: > > > > * Issue Series sent to the wrong mailing list or some > patches from the series correspond to different mailing lists > [test_target_mailing_list] > Suggested fix Send the series again to the correct mailing list (ML) > Suggested ML openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > [http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/] > Patch's path: meta-oe/recipes-extended/zram/zram/dev-zram0.swap > > * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch > [test_series_merge_on_head] > Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch > Targeted branch master (currently at 520c6f30cd) > > > > If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the > mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns. > Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new > version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the > version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> > [PATCH v3] -> ...). > > --- > Guidelines: > https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines > Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest > Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe