From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-devsrc: restructure for out of tree (and on target) module builds
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:02:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a443bc36-036f-89d2-be6b-b0a5d2d31d98@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d56fb567-09bd-2c35-28c0-00807a4a2f2d@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4654 bytes --]
On 7/12/18 7:55 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2018-07-12 9:53 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 09:49 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-10 5:41 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 12:38 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>> On 07/10/2018 06:21 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 11:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try the other configs, but clearly I have something
>>>>> different in
>>>>> my x86-64 build.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't run the self tests directly, but am copying the files
>>>>> onto my
>>>>> qemu session and running things myself:
>>>>>
>>>>> root@qemux86-64:/lib/modules/4.14.48-yocto-standard/build# make
>>>>> ARCH=x86
>>>>> scripts prepare
>>>>> Makefile:950: "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y, please
>>>>> install
>>>>> libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel"
>>>>> CHK scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.h
>>>>> SYSTBL arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h
>>>>> SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/asm/unistd_32_ia32.h
>>>>> SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/asm/unistd_64_x32.h
>>>>> SYSTBL arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h
>>>>> SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h
>>>>> SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
>>>>> SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h
>>>>> HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_32.o
>>>>> HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_64.o
>>>>> HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_common.o
>>>>> HOSTLD arch/x86/tools/relocs
>>>>> CHK include/config/kernel.release
>>>>> CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
>>>>> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
>>>>> Makefile:950: "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y, please
>>>>> install
>>>>> libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel"
>>>>>
>>>>> root@qemux86-64:/tmp# make
>>>>> make -C /usr/src/kernel M=/tmp modules
>>>>> make[1]: Entering directory '/lib/modules/4.14.48-yocto-
>>>>> standard/build'
>>>>> Makefile:950: "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y, please
>>>>> install
>>>>> libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel"
>>>>> Building modules, stage 2.
>>>>> MODPOST 1 modules
>>>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/lib/modules/4.14.48-yocto-
>>>>> standard/build'
>>>>> root@qemux86-64:/tmp# insmod hellomod.ko
>>>>> [ 419.211616] hellomod: loading out-of-tree module taints
>>>>> kernel.
>>>>> [ 419.212586] Hello world!
>>>>>
>>>>> This is on the core-image-kernel-dev image, which is the one that
>>>>> I created to test all this.
>>>>>
>>>>> What image is that using ? some sato sdk one ?
>>>>
>>>> We really need to find you a way to run these. The problem is the
>>>> qemu
>>>> graphics piece? You can't have a dummy vncserver or something to
>>>> direct
>>>> them at?
>>>>
>>>> The image is a core-image-sato-sdk...
>>>
>>> I was able to trigger the objtool issue with this image, looking at
>>> fixing it and the other arches now.
>>
>> Since its image related, is it a missing package dependency? Just
>> curious why its happening with some images but not your test ones...
>
> It is. I have extra toolchain elements being installed in
> core-image-kernel-dev
> that hold things together (i.e. the kernel's objtool doesn't need to
> be built).
>
> The obvious fix is to just add an RDEPENDS, but I'm being stubborn
> and trying to make it build on target, since the build of objtool from
> the kernel source is showing me some sort of include path issue that
> I'd like to sort out:
>
> CC /lib/modules/4.14.48-yocto-standard/build/tools/objtool/exec-cmd.o
> exec-cmd.c: In function 'get_pwd_cwd':
> exec-cmd.c:49:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'strlcpy'; did
> you mean 'strncpy'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> strlcpy(cwd, pwd, PATH_MAX);
> ^~~~~~~
> strncpy
> exec-cmd.c:49:4: error: nested extern declaration of 'strlcpy'
> [-Werror=nested-externs]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
Kernel has this function defined in tools/include/linux/string.h so
however it has it like this
#if defined(__GLIBC__) && !defined(__UCLIBC__)
extern size_t strlcpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t size);
#endif
Which means it will not work for musl and we need to ensure that we
use -D_GNU_SOURCE for it to be included from standard musl headers
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-12 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 15:53 [PATCH v2] kernel-devsrc: restructure for out of tree (and on target) module builds Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-10 10:21 ` Richard Purdie
2018-07-10 13:09 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-10 16:38 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-10 21:41 ` Richard Purdie
2018-07-11 2:34 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 13:49 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 13:53 ` Richard Purdie
2018-07-12 13:55 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 17:02 ` Khem Raj [this message]
2018-07-12 17:07 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 17:22 ` Khem Raj
2018-07-12 17:26 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-26 14:04 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-26 14:17 ` richard.purdie
2018-07-26 17:01 ` Richard Purdie
2018-07-30 22:26 ` richard.purdie
2018-07-31 1:07 ` Bruce Ashfield
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-28 19:20 Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-28 21:10 ` Mark Hatle
2018-02-28 21:12 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 8:28 ` Maxin B. John
2018-03-01 9:37 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-01 10:58 ` Maxin B. John
2018-03-01 12:58 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 13:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 14:22 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-01 14:45 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 14:57 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-02 14:23 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-02 14:26 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-02 15:20 ` Khem Raj
2018-03-02 18:16 ` Khem Raj
2018-03-02 19:29 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-02 23:14 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-01 12:57 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a443bc36-036f-89d2-be6b-b0a5d2d31d98@gmail.com \
--to=raj.khem@gmail.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox