From: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@linaro.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org, bill.mills@linaro.org,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, javier.tia@linaro.org
Subject: bitbake, oe-core and meta-yocto tags in sync? (was Re: GPIT LAVA Test Report - Job 123474: OEQA ALL PASSED (24/75) passed)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:06:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRROLHFAmzOAbzRj@nuoska> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <691381dc.7b0a0220.35e53.800e@mx.google.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 10:35:08AM -0800, ledge-bot@linaro.org wrote:
> LAVA Test Report for Job 123474
> ==================================================
>
> GitLab Pipeline Information:
> Project: gpit
> Branch: main
> Pipeline: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/trustedsubstrate/gpit/-/pipelines/2152817594
> bitbake: 2c6c40bdab8ebc6c04fe9992524add967fb4a053
> bitbake git describe: yocto-5.2.1-149-g2c6c40bda
> openembedded-core: e556df28f47e754b53e1f46c97dde2b19fd8fad1
> openembedded-core git describe: uninative-5.0-152-ge556df28f4
> meta-yocto: 66ea31cee15309af07afeee8dec8a6fe1d92d28e
> meta-yocto git describe: 5.3_M3-3-g66ea31c
So this is our first build and test run with separate bitbake,
oe-core and meta-yocto built using kas to replace old poky repo master
branch which no longer builds. Setup details in
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/trustedsubstrate/gpit
The "git describe" output with tags is a bit confusing. Would it be
possible to use same version/milestone names there?
Currently it's a bit hard to tell if the trees are fully in sync and if
yocto-5.2.1, uninative-5.0 and 5.3_M3 are compatible with each other
or not. From pure tags it is not easy to see if trees used same
branches, for example.
> LAVA Job Information:
> Job ID: 123474
> Description: gpit-kv260
> Device: laa-00077-kv260
> State: Finished
> URL: https://ledge.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/123474
>
> OEQA Test Results Summary:
> Total Tests: 75
> Passed: 24
> Failed: 0
> Errors: 0
> Skipped: 51
But at least all executed oeqa rutime tests on core-image-sato
with genericarm64 machine passed on AMD kv260 which is the same
result as with poky from one week ago before its retirement.
> Passed Tests:
> - connman.ConnmanTest.test_connmand_help
> - connman.ConnmanTest.test_connmand_running
> - date.DateTest.test_date
> - df.DfTest.test_df
> - oe_syslog.SyslogTest.test_syslog_running
> - oe_syslog.SyslogTestConfig.test_syslog_logger
> - oe_syslog.SyslogTestConfig.test_syslog_restart
> - opkg.OpkgRepoTest.test_opkg_install_from_repo
> - pam.PamBasicTest.test_pam
> - parselogs.ParseLogsTest.test_get_context
> - parselogs.ParseLogsTest.test_parselogs
> - ping.PingTest.test_ping
> - python.PythonTest.test_python3
> - scp.ScpTest.test_scp_file
> - ssh.SSHTest.test_ssh
> - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_basic
> - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_failed
> - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_list
> - systemd.SystemdJournalTests.test_systemd_boot_time
> - systemd.SystemdJournalTests.test_systemd_journal
> - systemd.SystemdServiceTests.test_systemd_disable_enable
> - systemd.SystemdServiceTests.test_systemd_status
> - systemd.SystemdServiceTests.test_systemd_stop_start
> - xorg.XorgTest.test_xorg_running
And we now list the passing tests in this report.
I think this is a useful detail to have.
Cheers,
-Mikko
> LAVA Test Suite Results:
> BITBAKE_COMMIT_HASH: 2c6c40bdab8ebc6c04fe9992524add967fb4a053
> BITBAKE_GIT_DESCRIBE: yocto-5.2.1-149-g2c6c40bda
> METAYOCTO_COMMIT_HASH: 66ea31cee15309af07afeee8dec8a6fe1d92d28e
> METAYOCTO_GIT_DESCRIBE: 5.3_M3-3-g66ea31c
> OECORE_COMMIT_HASH: e556df28f47e754b53e1f46c97dde2b19fd8fad1
> OECORE_GIT_DESCRIBE: uninative-5.0-152-ge556df28f4
>
> This is an automated test report.
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <691381dc.7b0a0220.35e53.800e@mx.google.com>
2025-11-12 9:06 ` Mikko Rapeli [this message]
2025-11-12 9:36 ` [Automated-testing] bitbake, oe-core and meta-yocto tags in sync? (was Re: GPIT LAVA Test Report - Job 123474: OEQA ALL PASSED (24/75) passed) Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRROLHFAmzOAbzRj@nuoska \
--to=mikko.rapeli@linaro.org \
--cc=automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org \
--cc=bill.mills@linaro.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=javier.tia@linaro.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox