Re: [PATCH 0/9] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 08:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:22 AM Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 10:28 -0400, bruce.ashfield@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > Richard,
> > > 
> > > Here's the next set of -stable updates to the active reference kernels.
> > > I also have updates back to 5.4 that I'll send to the various stable
> > > branches shortly.
> > > 
> > > I also have a couple of kern-tools fixes. One to solve a problem reported
> > > on the list about some directory structures (typically created from KAS)
> > > to break the meta-data phase of the kernel build. I've fixed that issue,
> > > then fixed the other regressions that fix caused, and have everything
> > > passing sanity. There shouldn't be any fallout, but I'll be keeping a
> > > close eye on things.
> > > 
> > > I also have Khem's MDIO configuration change in the queue, along with
> > > a previously hidden kern-tools feature that allows it to not warn if
> > > something is 'enabled' (y or m).
> > 
> > I have a patch in master-next I'm testing for the perf issue. On
> > testing that, this set of config warnings became clear for poky-tiny:
> > 
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/15/builds/6157
> 
> That's very likely due to this change from Andrei :
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-kernel-cache/commit/?h=yocto-5.19&id=d334505d98a85ffe7549026d10e43cccd897e19c
> 
> Was that a qemuarm64 configuration ?

It warned on qemux86:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/15/builds/6157/steps/12/logs/stdio

qemux86-64:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/15/builds/6157/steps/16/logs/stdio

qemuarm64:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/15/builds/6157/steps/18/logs/stdio

so on all the arches we test for tiny.

Cheers,

Richard