From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C92FD0075 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2026 19:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from delivery.antispam.mailspamprotection.com (delivery.antispam.mailspamprotection.com [185.56.87.10]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.msgproc02-g2.144746.1772393520914709357 for ; Sun, 01 Mar 2026 11:32:01 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@antispam.mailspamprotection.com header.s=default header.b=xg/MxjMc; dkim=pass header.i=@valla.it header.s=default header.b=vGpalEGM; spf=pass (domain: valla.it, ip: 185.56.87.10, mailfrom: francesco@valla.it) ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=outgoing.instance-europe-west4-m8mp.prod.antispam.mailspamprotection.com; s=arckey; t=1772393521; b=iLsIoB58Qieyp1nJKLzPzc9THgEvWQu8VnKMF8i0Q2q7a1db4aoU7Tyc2uxo2Kkj2jsQgOX96H YCknqJRGrnKoxkJU9IN/fidygq0nO3ClUt9PJ4lsEIS/8sFPcCiKsE5njrKevrNyz9mNnXApv/ x4snvIbC2XsEHbJaOCxf8NWKx5GWX66uy2ljMW8vsVN0/7SpL7/r+ipze9mEtHGn3HAqGqC1oG 4eM/SDLhg9NFx4sytLm72vNsXMbh4EoL7XcD/akTvZOLzgfGILo1M14g9HLiMzG7CNci/wlJ7N KTl3K6lKX8fVV99Vl3KptU0j9fIUhZkv82aXgoBgoeUQKw==; ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; outgoing.instance-europe-west4-m8mp.prod.antispam.mailspamprotection.com; smtp.remote-ip=35.214.173.214; iprev=pass (214.173.214.35.bc.googleusercontent.com) smtp.remote-ip=35.214.173.214; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=esm19.siteground.biz; dkim=pass header.d=valla.it header.s=default header.a=rsa-sha256; arc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=outgoing.instance-europe-west4-m8mp.prod.antispam.mailspamprotection.com; s=arckey; t=1772393521; bh=cjnTvA0GuB5B9me4Z6ASIIWGcsHxJfWMVu5Zbn+Yyc8=; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature; b=SIX1m3oINyftnXmYm7OuX1f8HJPnj1D/Q7F9c7j2tPYeKNK63e+II1+S2QmZpmEnL1VxKvfGjy nsdnCVTvx+Nfje3z3S94mIzPyvOsa9g1piqnl9o4tk1iQn5uXRVf96SmBcboj2npIlU8fkFDA3 VU1Q3HgjxZorLS8x94fHD2Yd+GAgnIKcx654u+Cr/7pAiWdON7cw2TBTtRyp87pTm3ZBOtbLxt 5z4wHMWkdUTV9SQ2y5L6K2rk/p1zjnQuBF59RzDA2CIy/+nwdnsZqvT8kR8cHK0WmoUnaPxlQW McI69ILTdSz4+5wLbIHflPHRMNASeipmNIjFl4/JnpZj/g==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antispam.mailspamprotection.com; s=default; h=CFBL-Feedback-ID:CFBL-Address :Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=7kr4nT8Y8jQM9wOwcohDXXtd1jP5owkRrt4UwVpDcBo=; b=xg/MxjMcOa8WPk3RsHOwgsO81m Zua3ryzmrhEsE6dVcxQ6MMJNteuJTbpBULYWK0/oy18ovhcsJN5U0g/WczKRIg8AS7y2lP03729Au X1q1tr5qEkJcak69//NduzNMBWAuKBDO/Y7v9W1mxmOVuCJ1s/+bNYYe3EAhbCNYYBo4=; Received: from 214.173.214.35.bc.googleusercontent.com ([35.214.173.214] helo=esm19.siteground.biz) by instance-europe-west4-m8mp.prod.antispam.mailspamprotection.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.1) (envelope-from ) id 1vwmWC-000000050kB-28KT for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:31:58 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valla.it; s=default; h=Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; bh=7kr4nT8Y8jQM9wOwcohDXXtd1jP5owkRrt4UwVpDcBo=; b=vGpalEGM9+1fvp0eZGwhIbxPAN B8VQgQRV2tscAHOtKU3CG3x+KhAsmKvkxtzj1665OdnkdKyclTE4vNPz25iL3+5P2tp4LUfWBU3HH WPJsV9K7Ah4eiFMLbNL0MqeaPDZBwjlKKDXWqBp7IVJ9DsZCbYj6k3Xffgr/UrVjXcWk=; Received: from [82.57.88.19] (port=64086 helo=bywater) by esm19.siteground.biz with essmtpa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.99.1) (envelope-from ) id 1vwmW6-000000002yu-3CVq; Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:31:50 +0000 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2026 20:31:49 +0100 From: Francesco Valla To: adrian.freihofer@gmail.com Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, Adrian Freihofer , Marek Vasut , Michael Opdenacker Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] oe-selftest: fitimage: allow relaxed node checks Message-ID: References: <20260228-fit_loadables-v1-0-3027ec37930d@valla.it> <20260228-fit_loadables-v1-1-3027ec37930d@valla.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esm19.siteground.biz X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.openembedded.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - valla.it X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-SGantispam-id: 68a8cf2adbaff64d6c46d19acd96bf2c X-AntiAbuse: ID - 68a8cf2adbaff64d6c46d19acd96bf2c AntiSpam-DLS: false AntiSpam-DLSP: AntiSpam-DLSRS: AntiSpam-TS: 1.0 CFBL-Address: feedback@antispam.mailspamprotection.com; report=arf CFBL-Feedback-ID: 1vwmWC-000000050kB-28KT-feedback@antispam.mailspamprotection.com Authentication-Results: outgoing.instance-europe-west4-m8mp.prod.antispam.mailspamprotection.com; iprev=pass (214.173.214.35.bc.googleusercontent.com) smtp.remote-ip=35.214.173.214; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=esm19.siteground.biz; dkim=pass header.d=valla.it header.s=default header.a=rsa-sha256; arc=none List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:32:08 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/232144 Hi Adrian, On Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 03:20:55PM +0100, adrian.freihofer@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Francesco > > Thank you for the nice patches. Also thank you for separating this > change into a separate patch to make it more obvious that this is > potentially a bit controversial. > > This looks like a risky change to me. Having a variable set to None by > accident is a common error which the test should catch. Just allowing > that is probably not the right approach. > I agree with you TBH. > Is it really not possible to make the tests providing the correct > reference values in the dict which compared against the output? > After some more thinking, I think I got the way in which uboot-config.bbclass (which was recently reworked to support flags on UBOOT_CONFIG_* variables) is approaching the matter. I'll rework the test approach and send a v2. > Regards, > Adrian > Thank you! Regards, Francesco