From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773E07E815 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id v19so1195512wmj.5 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:51:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ucXCrIQ3UWzMz0ZmW7NhREpeRe4ydjnoUhpD+Wtr9I=; b=GbLS79Lp3sPSNcUsw3XDzsJu7IPysI4Gn6i8cqYg3fjQLve3XZyaaJESo5IerEOJ49 L7xPH60q+cSP6OEbzksmyhDBYrALsUT5ggkCbFsJ4/NeaAVU7aVAw8UtyHfaop82JMdB AmO1aNDgBcROsXy1pnLlXvtvti7YK9suVoIwI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ucXCrIQ3UWzMz0ZmW7NhREpeRe4ydjnoUhpD+Wtr9I=; b=CxSD32Iu/6gYcQmFqNJxoQ5glLJvRorsDDeRIz+5hJn16lwn9ZTHGjsI6BVL6Cxz+i oEYmMbsBRN3mmVXge/TyNS/wQeq8X3ratcxPVAtoHzRLHujsfT/Z78/goKcB7iOu10pZ Gq8PjzK45zakU7C2APwVZr5pogNvzBRZ0Eo8pqAIa12wGMAeCKNU+Qjc3xduMFc7IQUC cCmjeFDEqy6bI4MB1+RNqM65Wo93yefrM3KVfQOQUmdXp9xoxbh7IShoqHdGSL7N7YnR vcvNA310nqpNE+Bw5mWKtwZoElyJPpdMTr9JL8l9T4TBzNi/MfnEqVLup3QVO8YiY0Ss IC0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWx5QVV4AX1GX6/ODst7LRyC9NtzXGXozsv2HHWDKlmXfvZuTf5 382EvEyOAK4+sVoXJz/QE6qg3A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwONTz8sNKoHhTadzwmQ/2ts5atkL1zn2yNMcKsp6YZrEQ6huhdKa7IYhOD0SQF5Lhf5hDtZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd9a:: with SMTP id y26mr7118199wmj.44.1562140317863; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm1253768wmf.12.2019.07.03.00.51.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Richard Purdie To: William Bourque , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:51:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20190702182403.24099-1-wbourque@gmail.com> <20190702183053.2330.89816@do> User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.2-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOKclyBwYXRjaHRlc3Q6IGZhaWx1cmUgZm9yIHdpYy9wbHVnaW5zOiBTb3VyY2UgdGhhdCBzdXBwb3J0IGJvdGggRUZJIGFuZCBCSU9T?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 07:51:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 15:22 -0400, William Bourque wrote: > Hi, > > The error "scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/bootimg-biosplusefi.py does > not exist" is a bit puzzling : this is the new file my patch is > adding. > Is this test failure expected for new files? > > I sent this using git-sendmail; should I submit using a different way > (pull request, ...)? I think the test is broken so we can ignore that. I've cc'd Sandy so she might be able to look into this issue if possible as we've seen it a few times. What I did wonder is whether we should be adding some tests to wic for this new plugin though? The existing tests are in meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/wic.py and can be run with "oe-selftest -r wic", would it make sense to add something to this as part of this change? Cheers, Richard