From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.10848.1586180915321618134 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 06:48:35 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=b6kADo2t; spf=pass (domain: linuxfoundation.org, ip: 209.85.128.68, mailfrom: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id y20so3990407wma.4 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 06:48:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=639HmEBNTBhlN9BylfsaoREmiv7y6pCOuv99yPiVm6s=; b=b6kADo2tkHQeThfY8QvNlv37UjMC7qlIG1Jrf34jiKSC9QF8wCwukXitw+FuddajUd S0fGqzYXzXiJ3bY2+c0iW9uA114jd3wjhZ0Y6C0l6gYMbBEeFxT2TmPKYKemzVPMn0nr +clw5D/N3edLF0Z7O2I5CHcFvtdA6rjPkidtg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=639HmEBNTBhlN9BylfsaoREmiv7y6pCOuv99yPiVm6s=; b=kvVza40wIWQvP6/INY6/IDCVWPDE3sVtWjymcGVt1QBUCuUe7Q8P4TH3/Wq3LOX9sM f5TmPWy3zY0I5yU1x7gUHc0aY0XdKJNusBC6Mb3wCgBhZNZ9juvwsfZhWOrgh4GQ2/WZ IMGhjIP1VVLaCbczmzK8gwOLl1ew1oC8r4IZ2N8jTJLH8ydY2+KtIoHJZZiIZWGiU9Hn Op4Oe0yCux3u80vwt4QXR0EjGnTa69aMdT+7N4O/R4G2+hZahOc7t6UtW4VmJA81Vks3 xAr5WuJukFqGjxCxovQZ0O0goZCstAPWP4V8mBLyPcVsn4SjZoDo3fYPOnK3z5VVuX2k xHOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubihMjzgYaB+Oc/UL/AQTK6jEMGg1OkcvcQNFLqOSVIoW7zQEF7 Vvh5gMSlh+8t3rTQm47vUOMSxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLvZsiEW6LmRaUHUJW0nVHe2jD29fShCgzMp2g8flgXGT77eOW+EVfGSUec3xCmGnasGuZSFw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4e06:: with SMTP id g6mr13610093wmh.186.1586180913815; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 06:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm24377193wmc.28.2020.04.06.06.48.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 06:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 1/2] wic: Fix permissions when using exclude or include path From: "Richard Purdie" To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Cc: openembedded-core , jpewhacker@gmail.com, Paul Barker Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 14:48:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20200304144936.2559106-1-ricardo@ribalda.com> <8a556aedfe46e327c5d64d77c3b282f2108d12aa.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1602DB74B6717A3F.2403@lists.openembedded.org> <0d818b09b16f9a1156643217599f6b774d1ebc17.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <16032F9D180FD5D7.1684@lists.openembedded.org> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 11:21 +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:04 AM Ricardo Ribalda via > lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:00 AM Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2020-04-05 at 17:44 +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > > > > Hi Richard > > > > > > > > Thanks for testing it out. Seems that I am either not very > > > > clever or > > > > I > > > > should not work on Sundays (or both), v1, and v2 where exactly > > > > the > > > > same. I am terribly sorry to spam you. > > > > > > > > I know it is abusing your patience, but can you try again. I > > > > would > > > > love to try it on my setup , but I cannot replicate the bug. > > > > > > > > As we speak I am running oe-selftest --run-tests wic.Wic on > > > > poky/fedora-30... > > > > > > I did re-run it, it took a while since a pseudo change > > > invalidates > > > sstate. It passed: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/86/builds/838 > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for testing it. I will prepare a new series including > > that patch. > > I saw that you already queue it for master-next: > > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/log/?h=master-next > > So I will not resend the series ;) > > > > I have send the Individual patch to pseudo, lets see if it is merged. > > Thanks! The pseudo patch is missing an Upstream-Status but I've added one to the version in master-next. We're struggling with an active maintainer for pseudo right now but I'll make sure itsin the queue. I've mentioned it to Peter just in case he can spot anything. Cheers, Richard