From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sogkh-0008W7-9r for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:09:43 +0200 Received: from cpec03f0ed08c7f-cm001ac318e826.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([174.115.5.73]:54731 helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SogZt-000672-It; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:58:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:58:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@oneiric To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1341927124.24837.8.camel@ted> <1341935849.1294.2.camel@ted> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - astoria.ccjclearline.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.openembedded.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Subject: Re: bitbake.conf: Add git-native to ASSUME_PROVIDED X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:09:43 -0000 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > > > my opinion, which is mine, is to add a script someone can run that > > tells them what appears to be safe to override from their current > > distro. that way, it's entirely optional and the developer deals with > > the output at their own risk. > > who determines the safeness ? thats what double QA RP mentioned is there's no *guarantee* of safeness, just an advisory based on nothing more than the version number. user makes their own decision and, if it breaks, they get to keep all the pieces. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================