Re: why does sysfsutils-2.1.0.bb set S = "${WORKDIR}/sysfsutils-${PV}"?

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>]

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Paul Eggleton wrote:

> On Monday 26 October 2015 06:23:09 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >
> > ... me snipped ...
> >
> > > I don't think so, it appears that line goes way back to the initial
> > > population of the repository. Looks like we could just drop it.
> >
> >   it *looks* like there are a number of lines like that in oe-core
> > that are superfluous ... some samples (which i have not verified, i
> > just selected from brief visual inspection):
> >
> > recipes-bsp/hostap/hostap-utils.inc:S = "${WORKDIR}/hostap-utils-${PV}"
> > recipes-bsp/pcmciautils/pcmciautils.inc:S = "${WORKDIR}/pcmciautils-${PV}"
> > recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc:S = "${WORKDIR}/openssl-${PV}"
> > recipes-core/sysvinit/sysvinit_2.88dsf.bb:S = "${WORKDIR}/sysvinit-${PV}"
> > recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib.inc:S = "${WORKDIR}/glib-${PV}"
> > recipes-core/sysfsutils/sysfsutils_2.1.0.bb:S =
> > "${WORKDIR}/sysfsutils-${PV}" recipes-devtools/mtools/mtools_3.9.9.bb:S =
> > "${WORKDIR}/mtools-${PV}" recipes-devtools/intltool/intltool.inc:S =
> > "${WORKDIR}/intltool-${PV}" recipes-devtools/git/git.inc:S =
> > "${WORKDIR}/git-${PV}"
> > recipes-extended/psmisc/psmisc.inc:S = "${WORKDIR}/psmisc-${PV}"
> > recipes-extended/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-26.bb:S =
> > "${WORKDIR}/net-tools-1.60"
> > recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+3_3.16.6.bb:S =
> > "${WORKDIR}/gtk+-${PV}"
> > recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile_1.1.0.bb:S = "${WORKDIR}/oprofile-${PV}"
> > recipes-multimedia/libid3tag/libid3tag_0.15.1b.bb:S =
> > "${WORKDIR}/libid3tag-${PV}" ... etc etc ...
> >
> > and probably lots more. do i have at least the right understanding
> > that any setting of S which eventally equates to
> > ${WORKDIR}/${BPN}-${PV} serves no useful purpose? (not sure about
> > *-native recipes, though, i have to take a closer look at those to see
> > if they fit the pattern.)
>
> Now, you really need to be careful with this - in some cases these
> files are included from other recipes where PN is not the same as it
> would be in the standard recipe; there it is deliberate and
> "cleaning it up" would actually break the other recipe. Additionally
> I can see above, net-tools isn't a candidate because the version
> part is not the same ("1.60" vs "1.60-26"). Every recipe will need
> to be checked.

  oh, i realize this ... i did say that this was a very cursory list i
hadn't checked carefully yet. i may or may not do any of this cleanup,
i just wanted to make sure i was at least understanding the occasional
redundancy correctly.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================