From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp485.redcondor.net (smtp485.redcondor.net [208.80.204.85]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BA9606BF for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by smtp485.redcondor.net ({3be039ea-4351-44b0-a8af-642c38b25916}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTPS id 20160726142744038_0485; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:27:44 +0000 X-RC-FROM: Received: from [216.191.234.70] (port=19292 helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bS3MR-0002Sb-UQ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:29:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:27:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: "Burton, Ross" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MAG-OUTBOUND: ccj.redcondor.net@64.235.106.9/32 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: why is "run-postinsts" considered a "development" recipe? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:27:48 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323328-2133194943-1469543256=:14653" --8323328-2133194943-1469543256=:14653 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 26 July 2016 at 15:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >   i'm good with that, and one more (potentially idiotic) question > about run-postinsts. i note in the OE recipe file that it inherits > "update-rc.d", but i'm not sure why. > >   AIUI (and i could be totally off-base here), i thought systemd > needed update-rc.d only for backward compatibility for sysvinit-style > services, is that right? > >   so while run-postinsts is free to inherit update-rc.d, does that > have any value if one is not using any sysvinit-driven services? or am > i misunderstanding the fundamental functionality of update-rc.d? > > It inherits update-rcd and systemd so that it runs on both systemd > and sysvinit systems. ok, so my initial assumption was correct ... its value lies solely in interoperability with sysvinit components; if i have a pure systemd build, it has no effect. gotcha. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== --8323328-2133194943-1469543256=:14653--