Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Christopher Larson <clarson@kergoth.com>
Cc: OE Core mailing list <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: most efficient way to map perl RH rpms to OE package names?
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:51:23 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1610250738570.8652@ca624034.mitel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZANnYLS0pfSpdzf3NVV4KEg_88b9mPark9gpstJUFHZTzxQ@mail.gmail.com>


  following up on my original query, i'm now in the process of
"mapping" a couple hundred CentOS perl rpms to their OE equivalents,
and here's the process so far; just want to check that i'm going about
this in a sane way.

  first, as chris larson suggested, use "oe-pkgdata-util" to see which
generated perl modules appear to match up to equivalent rpms, and
quite a number of them seem to be direct equivalents, such as:

 * perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.033-3.el7.noarch
 * perl-module-http-tiny

so examples like that appear pretty straightforward.

  next, i noticed that there are a few perl recipes under OE,
recipes-devtools and recipes-extended, a couple *apparent*
equivalents:

 * perl-XML-LibXML-2.0018-5.el7.x86_64
 * libxml-perl_0.08.bb

 * perl-XML-NamespaceSupport-1.11-10.el7.noarch
 * libxml-namespacesupport-perl_1.11.bb

and so on. not so many of those but still, that took care of a few
more matches.

  finally, i figure i'm going to have to dive into meta-cpan for the
rest, and here's something puzzling.

  one of the RH rpms to be matched was
perl-IO-Compress-2.061-2.el7.noarch, but the generated modules were:

  perl-module-io-compress-deflate
  perl-module-io-compress-adapter-bzip2
  perl-module-io-compress-zlib-extra
  perl-module-io-compress-zip-constants
  perl-module-io-compress-bzip2
  perl-module-io-compress-adapter-identity
  perl-module-io-compress-zlib-constants
  perl-module-io-compress-base-common
  perl-module-io-compress-adapter-deflate
  perl-module-io-compress-gzip
  perl-module-io-compress-zip
  perl-module-io-compress-gzip-constants
  perl-module-io-compress-base
  perl-module-io-compress-rawdeflate

but no "perl-module-io-compress", which is what i would have expected.

  however, if i pop over to meta-cpan, there *is* a recipe file
"io-compress-perl_2.069.bb". can anyone explain how i should interpret
this?

  it seems (and i am not a perl expert) that the foundation
IO::Compress recipe is at meta-cpan, but the more specific sub-modules
are built from the base OE perl recipe. or is it that these modules:

  perl-module-io-compress-base-common
  perl-module-io-compress-base

represent the base class? i'm just trying to figure out the standard
OE packaging for perl modules.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-25 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-24 20:53 most efficient way to map perl RH rpms to OE package names? Robert P. J. Day
2016-10-24 21:50 ` Christopher Larson
2016-10-25  6:42   ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-10-25  6:48   ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-10-25  7:05     ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-10-25 15:07       ` Christopher Larson
2016-10-26  3:20         ` Tim Orling
2016-10-26  9:48         ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-10-26 12:52           ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-10-26  9:55         ` Robert P. J. Day
2016-10-25 11:51   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2016-10-25 12:11   ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.20.1610250738570.8652@ca624034.mitel.com \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=clarson@kergoth.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox