Re: WRL error: "Can't locate Config_heavy-target.pl in @INC" -- OE versus WRL

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>]

  sorry, i'm still confused, let me make sure i understand this ...

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016, Mark Hatle wrote:

> On 11/12/16 2:45 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >   (note: this is actually an error i'm getting under wind river linux
> > 8, i'm just curious as to why OE works just fine.)
> >
> >   as mentioned, when trying to build a trivial hand-rolled perl recipe
> > under wind river linux 8, i'm getting:
> >
> > | Can't locate Config_heavy-target.pl in @INC (@INC contains: ... long
> > path snipped ...) at
> > .../tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib/perl-native/perl/5.22.0/Config.pm
> > line 88.
>
> My suspicion is that you are not using the buildtools-tarball with
> your OE build, ...

  that would be correct, i've never used that, never needed to, on my
fedora system. which means (correct me if i'm wrong) that i *am* using
some natively-installed content, based on ASSUME_PROVIDED from
bitbake.conf. and i notice there's a few extra lines there than what i
remember from quite some time back, including

    hostperl-runtime-native \

so i'll have to look at what that means. but the point here is that
the OE build *does* work.

> but Wind River Linux automatically uses this in an attempt to avoid
> host incompatibilities with all of the random hosts our customers
> use.

  ok, so WRL builds and uses the buildtools-tarball, and that's where
i get the aforementioned error.

> To use the OE version of buildtools-tarball, you will have to build
> it, extract it and then source the environment file.

  and that's where i'm confused ... i'm not using the OE version of
buildtools-tarball with my OE build and things *work*, so why would i
want to use it *now*? this seems backwards.

> >   but building precisely the same recipe under regular OE (actually,
> > poky) works just fine. i did some searching, and found this:
> >
> > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/111047/
> >
> > but i have no idea what it means. i also notice that the standard
> > bitbake.conf (which i haven't looked at in a while), now contains a
> > few more ASSUME_PROVIDED entries, including:
> >
> >     hostperl-runtime-native \
> >     hostpython-runtime-native \
>
> f4dade8e meta/conf/bitbake.conf         (Ed Bartosh                2016-01-07
> 13:39:39 +0200 179)     hostperl-runtime-native \
> 8a474057 meta/conf/bitbake.conf         (Ed Bartosh                2016-01-13
> 10:03:04 +0200 180)     hostpython-runtime-native \
>
> These are newer then Wind River Linux 8, which is based on Yocto Project 2.0 /
> Jethro which was released around Nov 2015.
>
> > while the WRL version contains:
> >
> >     perl-native-runtime \
> >     python-native-runtime \
>
> You you look at Jethro you will see:
>
> 34927dfa meta/conf/bitbake.conf         (Richard Purdie          2007-12-18
> 15:04:06 +0000 174)     perl-native-runtime \
> 34927dfa meta/conf/bitbake.conf         (Richard Purdie          2007-12-18
> 15:04:06 +0000 175)     python-native-runtime \
>
> So you are attempting to compare apples to oranges (master/morty/krogoth against
> jethro.)

  so ... what is the solution here? how would i tweak my WRL build to
resolve this issue? again, apologies for asking a WRL question on the
OE list, i'm just trying to understand the difference.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================