From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp486.redcondor.net (smtp486.redcondor.net [208.80.204.86]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0337960123 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]) by smtp486.redcondor.net ({6695537a-536a-45f9-a249-877c85428649}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTPS id 20161125110427197_0486 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:04:27 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from [216.191.234.70] (port=37883 helo=crashcourse.ca) by astoria.ccjclearline.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cAEIk-0003Ke-Tb for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:04:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:03:11 -0500 (EST) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@ca624034.mitel.com To: OE Core mailing list Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MAG-OUTBOUND: ccj.redcondor.net@64.235.106.9/32 Subject: YAPQ: Perl RPM2 module versus rpm's PACKAGECONFIG[perl]? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:04:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII ok, this should be the last perl issue i have for a bit ... the last OE perl module i was after was RPM2 (Perl bindings for the RPM Package Manager API): https://metacpan.org/pod/RPM2 but a side question -- i can see the OE rpm recipe file, including this snippet: # Perl modules are not built, but they could be enabled fairly easily # the perl module creation and installation would need to be patched. # (currently has host perl contamination issues) WITH_PERL = "--with-perl --without-perlembed --without-perl-urpm" WITHOUT_PERL = "--without-perl --without-perl-urpm" PACKAGECONFIG[perl] = "${WITH_PERL},${WITHOUT_PERL},perl," so ... 1) i know nothing about RPM2's API, is that the same as what i would get from rpm being PACKAGECONFIG'ed with perl? 2) in any event, is rpm's PACKAGECONFIG[perl] still broken so that i can't use it, anyway? that's about it. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ========================================================================