From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com (mail-pl1-f194.google.com [209.85.214.194]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.211.1591385287076035342 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:28:07 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TzWe47xP; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.214.194, mailfrom: raj.khem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y17so4096634plb.8 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:28:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dag7CrxK5P734ehj6+ElGIVJiNPbgUPAzsXBjYxbpww=; b=TzWe47xP+Jz+1i5VJjZ/5pubV/u/5rPUVlZkLIPuPAWfw4mnlX5MCUWWPOxTdgLvno OOJxXr/fnq2LpSs9VvFHm5dBiiFrMm3MIxIPS9gl4N8VXR5bZCBlXmAp5eVdkDQ6Kf1S SPPImXjo05vDKz9VVEEWTLNTqgNVkJxEZVmH0nvkPwX4asClczJ0v85rPMLO6U7A6ENK aFSBP7QuatnM4EtnARsUVTu/ccqchp2WqmZjgJogizZ2S9haMufYqkqu6nfAmk8scOI1 h4SOnv16+IwOT8wWYtDyF80ELngRw+qPuwSvXz60lUatBkBcZgXvQgyv5gaE8TQxJFfj YD2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dag7CrxK5P734ehj6+ElGIVJiNPbgUPAzsXBjYxbpww=; b=mBiKpcsUOKTNIPhjIY/ulta44yIWml28XwonXDRAYVKnA35DjwAlMW7PQTDWzw9R6L hRCIoA2zOvEMc67pj1pvG9u6nnXld/17yh1Eoi7DBU4kpk0TZSY10Zzq+sKyfYr3jv3k xhMG+o2rFeKliLdsJCu6NtgkjFRRSjWT/lJ7n4NaBHk3XC5/ri8rG0hY8WUwXTpYkxIQ QVaVZY4ryHr3MciIhE3HT60/O8ye0QkoLR29wy4qz6DB3DHGcl5rFv4rd6XfSi0xGeqa VyhqUx5v0eNcygdhx/Z4hPvW+H4JLqcoxv8eCkre3fWn3GHidckC9N9O82Osb2KvEOFQ 4HsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DGifTYWqL/yoTaNpwlPZQSIXAiB2YsVwAvx7crSAV+K7hfpJ6 nP8vmzU2ZslVg62tA/VsBW4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpdyt0sxTn9RZM/AXAlK8/RUr77HAT3BVpIxjW2DPsRSqDXFa/GZchoyIB8sw97P/XbZYjxg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d711:: with SMTP id w17mr10814615ply.139.1591385286441; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9200:4e0:392e:a386:560f:8a74? ([2601:646:9200:4e0:392e:a386:560f:8a74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k11sm281537pgq.10.2020.06.05.12.28.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [OE-core] Status of support for recent host glibc To: Yann Dirson , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_M=c3=bcller?= References: From: "Khem Raj" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:28:04 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 6/5/20 6:10 AM, Yann Dirson wrote: > I just got hit by the following dunfell build issue on my debian/testing > dev box: > >  argp-fmtstream.c:(.text+0x4ca): undefined reference to `_IO_fwide' >  /home/yann/yocto/meta-blade/meta-shadow-os/build-boxv2/tmp/hosttools/ld: argp-fmtstream.c:(.text+0x51d): undefined reference to `_IO_fwide' >  /home/yann/yocto/meta-blade/meta-shadow-os/build-boxv2/tmp/hosttools/ld: argp-help.o: in function `argp_failure': >  argp-help.c:(.text+0x1fb1): undefined reference to `_IO_fwide' >  collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >  make: *** [Makefile:60: localedef] Error 1 > > After some digging I found > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/20136 whose patch 4 > addresses this very problem. > Please send a backport request if its not already done so and Cc Steve Sakoman ( dunfell maintainer ), also check the supported hosts list for dunfell https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/3.1/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#detailed-supported-distros this case is not seen on commonly supported distros hence no request to backport perhaps. Debian testing is rolling distibution and its hard to support time based releases on top of rolling host distributions. > I could not find any discussion about those patches (it's hard to be > sure though, I found the > new mail archive quite impractical). > > Are there any reasons why this 2019-09 series is still NEW ? I know its confusing but For OE-core and bitbake too, patchwork is not primary tool for cherry-picking patches from mailing list, its email based, since its primarily driven by maintainer's convenience more than anything else. so dont read into status of the patchwork series status.