From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com (mail-wr0-f195.google.com [209.85.128.195]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E935674702 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f195.google.com with SMTP id p18-v6so7088858wrm.1 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 14:20:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oJ5bDeCTkl7XP7X1iwYBp8XfBFUHECuo0WDWQ2P1mBA=; b=iAnQBF4ttTKNfqIwvuteia/Xl+4CR58AYTAQ4w3rjw7HSJErHydNRCZ1+pAglIUL5W 7tsi+4olNBkuGJMagF7FlF/viKfxQFvNjJ8J43f8BO472H/7AwX1TFf08qu9f8AKbAp8 tOvCAdith3Lnh+Mea6CPjkaGzrWAUkGTy4hQ+yv6yzX10w40snV9/yn91iK043oJWvGS gjWwM3JUFdBiZO6yh8sNbk8cJP+UISnOJiEisstQ9cgBjXfya8pg8Ixx7R+KKm6IMN+e 8Xsn+mDroqbP+yDrFef5xrGREyZVtRpVxhcY1+lDrykdhpdHgbjjCxqAH3CbOiyNfXNi AbdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oJ5bDeCTkl7XP7X1iwYBp8XfBFUHECuo0WDWQ2P1mBA=; b=HdyNn8kZDOz4Ckn7Y+WLsRqAxybh3a6YiUn5DphmQKf0ApN4XFmtoqGuPd1odgAX6B gcjI2lX0AGrou2CqFJtPoCiuFEVLvbMZJ8nhvgR9T2enbR18S4BMuU16p0xAT2EoZRjp 4WznZyaGorZEyDiDkFtzn8h+TzFkWzGj8aSsPtYnnig8rhDVG3YjLN9IvLlR0cZqUszu bmy+3D4pNxgNwHypHqWYUiYkTH0HyQF85vEw8huhd52lXnPx4pIQ/FJytmvji4LZV9yH j9Rxk1/Rpe91nmWAdagDqNaIlFV0HI93pvqYR7X7kWHT3WDbSogKSKeHl+Y451sNub2y 0w6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfPwkgPs2yeAwfRTi0NJjnIVrGjrKmSkxsXK80el8Bu+1R1amF3 uEo46PAVTZWiwGLFOGqZhaAtTXfB X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZozGo09ja/+LGGpqckgiPvDtF1p98t0q5mmpzwYFhkTdrYgfAvdUoyFycdjUpbMh6gW+aE4EA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4045:: with SMTP id w5-v6mr200546wrp.96.1526592056729; Thu, 17 May 2018 14:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ip-86-49-107-50.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.107.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k82-v6sm6279477wmf.17.2018.05.17.14.20.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 May 2018 14:20:56 -0700 (PDT) To: Alexander Kanavin , "Burton, Ross" References: <20180517021314.0C556440002@auh.yoctoproject.org> <3fab3122-1ddd-d70a-2d3f-00a1e436be4b@linux.intel.com> <8c49ac0d-e52e-505b-d6c2-688ca7b3fb6e@gmail.com> <0df38331-afdf-b47c-410e-6640c74e8b14@linux.intel.com> From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:20:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0df38331-afdf-b47c-410e-6640c74e8b14@linux.intel.com> Cc: auh@auh.yoctoproject.org, OE-core Subject: Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 21:20:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/17/2018 03:04 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 05/17/2018 01:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> Looks like AUH runs as a x86 machine, which is why it doesn't catch >>>> u-boot. >>> >>> Also we have already discussed this 2 month ago. Marek, as the u-boot >>> maintainer, can you look into enabling u-boot on qemu please? >> >> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the AUH so it handles U-Boot and >> similar packages correctly even without the qemu dependency ? > > Determining the latest upstream version, performing the recipe upgrade, > and testing that the upgraded version builds are all done by calling > bitbake. Which of course requires that MACHINE is set to something > specific, in this case qemux86. As u-boot is disabled there, it gets > skipped. I could special-case u-boot, but I do think it's better to > enable it on qemu, which would also allow better AB testing across > architectures and during runtime (booting images) for instance. Let's see how this works: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/915781/ Once this gets mainline, we should then be able to enable u-boot for qemux86/qemux86-64 . I have a patch ready for that too, but let's wait until the U-Boot patch discussion is over. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut