From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jose Quaresma <quaresma.jose@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Jolley <sjolley.yp.pm@gmail.com>,
Yocto-mailing-list <yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org>,
",openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Yocto Project Status 13 February 2024 (WW07)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:33:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8e60d2febe6c9369da2f5b9923b4afc6f69e47d.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANPvuRmpF1m_TCQPotoNLUQUoW6FHJxEJsDnvBGr4docaCgK3A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2024-02-16 at 13:12 +0000, Jose Quaresma wrote:
>
>
> Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> escreveu (sexta,
> 16/02/2024 à(s) 11:34):
> > On Tue, 2024-02-13 at 08:50 -0700, Stephen Jolley wrote:
> > > * We are now a week from feature freeze for 5.0, our next LTS
> > > release
> >
> > For better or worse but probably not entirely surprisingly, there
> > are
> > quite a few things that we may want to try and fit in. I've listed
> > them
> > just so everyone knows what is on the list:
> >
> > * genericarm64 machine
> > * add qemuriscv64 tests to the autobuilder, for M3 only
> > * devtool changes to use git notes
> > * hashserve improvements
> > * pending changes in master-next where review is still being worked
> > * change to rust test suite logging
> > * devtool IDE changes
> >
> > Also things which are worrying:
> >
> > * Rust upgrade blocked by reproducibility issues
> > * musl upgrade blocked by large number of unsubmitted pending
> > patches
> > * nativesdk-systemd usage broken by usrmerge requirement (we're
> > not
> > changing the SDK layout days before freeze)
> >
> > I'm sure there are some things I'm forgetting too.
> >
> > Please let me know ASAP if there is anything else pending.
>
> I think it would also be important to update the golang toolchain
> from the 1.20.x
> we haven't done it yet the 1.21 and 1.22.
> I intend to dedicate some time to 1.21 but I can't promise anything
> and there is a
> high probability that I won't be able to correct the problems that
> exist.
Whilst I agree that would be nice, I have no knowledge in that area, no
available time and nobody else seems to have that either. Not sure what
we can do in that case :(
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 15:50 Yocto Project Status 13 February 2024 (WW07) Stephen K Jolley
2024-02-16 11:34 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2024-02-16 13:12 ` Jose Quaresma
2024-02-16 13:33 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2024-02-16 14:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
2024-02-19 12:09 ` Alexander Kanavin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8e60d2febe6c9369da2f5b9923b4afc6f69e47d.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=quaresma.jose@gmail.com \
--cc=sjolley.yp.pm@gmail.com \
--cc=yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox