From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Latest AB-INT unexplained mystery failure
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:05:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b950f28016d4a59baf20047279b33f07182c97be.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17FE0CA1425F2338.24631@lists.openembedded.org>
On Sun, 2024-10-13 at 16:26 +0100, Richard Purdie via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> I've spent quite a bit of time trying to reproduce/debug this:
>
> https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org//#/builders/35/builds/216/steps/14/logs/stdio
>
> 2024-10-13 04:12:32,010 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
> runtime_test.TestImage.test_testimage_apt: FAILED (218.02s)
> 2024-10-13 04:12:32,010 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
> runtime_test.TestImage.test_testimage_dnf: FAILED (155.47s)
>
> on debian11-vk-1.
>
> I've a successful test and a failed test testimage output for
> comparison:
>
> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/shared-failure-data/debian11-vk-1-selftest/log.do_testimage.1487387
> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/shared-failure-data/debian11-vk-1-selftest/log.do_testimage.3323465
>
> along with qemu serial output:
>
> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/shared-failure-data/debian11-vk-1-selftest/qemu_boot_log-fail
> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/shared-failure-data/debian11-vk-1-selftest/qemu_boot_log.20241013104106
>
> I've tried rerunning that exact series of tests on that worker with
> no
> success reproducing the issue. The image was overwritten by a later
> test so we can't retest the exact image. I've checked the journal on
> that system and there isn't anything related around the time this
> happened. The two failures were on different network interfaces and
> both interfaces work on later tests.
This is happening on most builds on debian11 for my test branch. If I
add new changes, the issue doesn't happen so it looks to be timing
related and needs a populated sstate cache.
I put auditing into runqemu's tap locks codepaths and the devices are
being locked/released correctly, there is no duplicate device usage.
I also went through the non-tap/tun codepaths and I can't spot any
issues, we do use slirp in some tests.
Since we have a trigger point where we know it is failing (the runtime
ping and ssh tests), I added a os.system("ps awx") into it. That gave
me a process dump of what was running when this happens.
https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/shared-failure-data/debian11-vk-1-selftest/3/log.do_testimage.3603268
https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/shared-failure-data/debian11-vk-1-selftest/3/log.do_testimage.3902903
https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/shared-failure-data/debian11-vk-1-selftest/3/log.do_testimage.4042146
From those we can conclude that there is only one qemu-system-* running
using the appropriate interface. I couldn't spot any other particularly
untoward processes running. That tells us a lot of things it isn't I
guess.
In addition to the ps, I've now added a netstat -tunape to see if we
can see something holding a network connection open. I'm wondering
about our httpserver used in some tests, or debuginfod, or something.
That build is ongoing.
> I'm open to ideas...
I still am, this one is proving to be a pain...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-19 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <17FE0CA1425F2338.24631@lists.openembedded.org>
2024-10-14 13:46 ` [OE-core] Latest AB-INT unexplained mystery failure Richard Purdie
2024-10-22 13:30 ` Ross Burton
[not found] ` <17FE55BCAF4D83DD.4702@lists.openembedded.org>
2024-10-14 16:11 ` Richard Purdie
2024-10-14 20:40 ` Richard Purdie
2024-10-15 8:23 ` Richard Purdie
2024-10-15 10:09 ` Richard Purdie
2024-10-15 8:18 ` Richard Purdie
2024-10-19 11:05 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
[not found] ` <17FFD5DF016C394D.24795@lists.openembedded.org>
2024-10-19 21:48 ` Richard Purdie
2024-10-21 10:55 ` Alexander Kanavin
2024-10-22 9:58 ` Richard Purdie
2024-10-22 19:48 ` Michael Halstead
2024-10-23 15:28 ` Khem Raj
2024-10-23 15:33 ` Alexander Kanavin
2024-10-23 15:35 ` Richard Purdie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b950f28016d4a59baf20047279b33f07182c97be.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox