Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v6 6/6] oeqa/sdk/meson: Skip test when SDK arch != build machine arch

[Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein@oss.nxp.com>]

On 4/16/2025 11:16 AM, Tom Hochstein via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> On 4/15/2025 5:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> [You don't often get email from richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org. 
>> Learn why this is important at 
>> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 12:28 -0500, Tom Hochstein via 
>> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>>> The SDK Meson test fails when the SDK is not for the build machine:
>>> ```
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>     File 
>>> "/srv/pokybuild/yocto-worker/qemux86/build/meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/meson.py", line 47, in test_epoxy
>>>       self.assertNotEqual(data["build"]["c"]["exelist"], 
>>> data["host"]["c"]["exelist"])
>>>                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
>>> KeyError: 'c'
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Skip the test in this case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Hochstein <tom.hochstein@oss.nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>>   meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/meson.py | 5 +++++
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> I think this may not be quite right as I saw:
>>
>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/42/builds/1370
>>
>> in my build with this series applied.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
> 
> 
> Thanks, Richard. I'm able to reproduce this. It's specific to 
> meta-ide-support.
> 
> The setup looks fine:
> 
> $ meson setup --warnlevel 1 -Degl=no -Dglx=no -Dx11=false build
> meson-wrapper: Running meson with setup options: " 
> --cross-file=.../poky/build/tmp/sysroots/x86_64/usr/share/meson/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-meson.cross --native-file=.../poky/build/tmp/sysroots/x86_64/usr/share/meson/meson.native "
> The Meson build system
> Version: 1.7.2
> ...
> 
> The KeyError appears because the build machine data is empty:

This assertion turns out to be wrong. In fact, the build machine data is
empty in the working case as well. I propose to drop this part of the
new test, as the remaining part of the test seems sufficient.

> 
> $ meson introspect -i --compilers build
> {
>      "host": {
>          "c": {
>              "id": "gcc",
>              "exelist": [
>                  "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc",
>                  "-mthumb",
>                  "-mfpu=neon",
>                  "-mfloat-abi=hard",
>                  "-mcpu=cortex-a15",
>                  "-fstack-protector-strong",
>                  "-O2",
>                  "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2",
>                  "-Wformat",
>                  "-Wformat-security",
>                  "-Werror=format-security",
>                  "-D_TIME_BITS=64",
>                  "-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64",
>                  "--sysroot=.../poky/build/tmp/sysroots/qemuarm"
>              ],
>              "linker_exelist": [
>                  "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc",
>                  "-mthumb",
>                  "-mfpu=neon",
>                  "-mfloat-abi=hard",
>                  "-mcpu=cortex-a15",
>                  "-fstack-protector-strong",
>                  "-O2",
>                  "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2",
>                  "-Wformat",
>                  "-Wformat-security",
>                  "-Werror=format-security",
>                  "-D_TIME_BITS=64",
>                  "-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64",
>                  "--sysroot=.../poky/build/tmp/sysroots/qemuarm"
>              ],
>              "file_suffixes": [
>                  "c"
>              ],
>              "default_suffix": "c",
>              "version": "14.2.0",
>              "full_version": "arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0",
>              "linker_id": "ld.bfd"
>          }
>      },
>      "build": {}
> }
> 
> I don't understand why. The meson.native file looks the same as for the 
> standalone SDK case, and the meson machine data seems fine.
> 
> $ meson introspect -i --machines build/
> {
>      "host": {
>          "system": "linux",
>          "cpu_family": "arm",
>          "cpu": "arm",
>          "endian": "little",
>          "kernel": null,
>          "subsystem": null,
>          "is_64_bit": false,
>          "exe_suffix": "",
>          "object_suffix": "o"
>      },
>      "build": {
>          "system": "linux",
>          "cpu_family": "x86_64",
>          "cpu": "x86_64",
>          "endian": "little",
>          "kernel": "linux",
>          "subsystem": "linux",
>          "is_64_bit": true,
>          "exe_suffix": "",
>          "object_suffix": "o"
>      },
>      "target": {
>          "system": "linux",
>          "cpu_family": "arm",
>          "cpu": "arm",
>          "endian": "little",
>          "kernel": null,
>          "subsystem": null,
>          "is_64_bit": false,
>          "exe_suffix": "",
>          "object_suffix": "o"
>      }
> }
> 
> I'm stuck.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#215000): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/215000
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/112214633/3617670
> Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [tom.hochstein@oss.nxp.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>