From: "Böszörményi Zoltán" <zboszor@gmail.com>
To: Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Max Ihlenfeldt <max@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [whinlatter][PATCH 0/4] gn: upgrade to latest revision
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 08:11:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4e5c72f-84eb-419f-ba74-7a091de6848f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DH8OLEZRDNFV.3D8WHZTAXNI2F@smile.fr>
2026. 03. 21. 19:45 keltezéssel, Yoann Congal írta:
> On Sat Mar 21, 2026 at 3:02 PM CET, Böszörményi Zoltán wrote:
>> 2026. 03. 21. 10:19 keltezéssel, Yoann Congal írta:
>>> On Sat Mar 21, 2026 at 8:36 AM CET, Zoltan Boszormenyi via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>>>> The latest revision of gn is needed to build Chromium 145
>>>> for whinlatter. Nothing else.
>>>>
>>>> See https://github.com/OSSystems/meta-browser/pull/963
>>>>
>>>> Please merge these into whinlatter.
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Sorry but general upgrades like this are not acceptable for stable.
>> I can keep the gn_git.bbappend in the meta-browser PR.
>>
>> But then it's not better when every layer shipped their version
>> before moving it to core.
>>
>>> Is there a verifiable stability promise from gn upstream that would
>>> somehow make that acceptable? Note that I'm not familiar with it.
>> Chromium updates carry a lot of CVE fixes, too.
>> gn is just a build tool for it and other projects.
> Yes I understand.
> But this upgrade has feature changes in it (see below) and those are
> generaly unacceptable on the risk breaking existing code and our
> stability promise.
>
> Your whole series upgrade gn by 43 commits. I saw these ones that are
> problematic just by reading the commit title:
> $ git log --oneline 81b24e01531ecf0eff12ec9359a555ec3944ec4e..9d19a7870add65151ff91bcc26252bb7521065cf
> 7498ca2e Add validation support to gn analyze/desc/path/refs
> 3c0f5be7 Add pcm files to the deps of phony target
> bd3356ac Add `validations` dependency type to targets
> 1d89b984 Add conductor setup files
> 4e0818fd Add a sha256 hash implementation and use it for string_hash
> 0eb071f6 Add a `module_name` flag to source_set.
> bf891ce4 Refactor module name to be dynamic.
> 8450d601 Optimize vector creation in compile_commands_writer.cc.
> 6e0b557d Run 'tools/run_formatter.sh'
> ab6f8b21 Implement `string_hash` function.
At least this one is needed by Chromium 145.
Its do_configure failed due to missing function.
> d92aee22 Support weak_libraries
> 4619125b Do not add .inputdeps paths to --ninja-outputs-file
> fb3b73df Make clang modules output -fmodule-file=foo=<pcm>.
> e7f32021 Add --file_relation to gn refs command
> 20a6b6d6 Optimize vector initialization and preallocation in desc_builder.cc.
> a0c5124a Add `reserve` statement when vector size is known beforehand.
> 092f4f0d Refactor container update by preferring the range insert.
>
> If you want a shared repo with an upgraded gn for LTS, what do
> you think about creating a mixin layer?
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_Release_and_LTS#LTS_%E2%80%9CMixin%E2%80%9D_repositories
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-lts-mixins
>
> For whinlatter (stable but not a LTS) which have more or less a month of
> support left, the bbappend in your layer is, IMHO, the realistic
> solution.
meta-browser is not my layer, I just create PRs for it.
Thanks, anyway.
cc-ed the maintainer of meta-browser.
Maybe it would be best to branch off whinlatter and
cherry-pick new versions and add the gn bbappend there later.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-22 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-21 7:36 [whinlatter][PATCH 0/4] gn: upgrade to latest revision Zoltán Böszörményi
2026-03-21 7:36 ` [whinlatter][PATCH 1/4] " Zoltán Böszörményi
2026-03-21 7:36 ` [whinlatter][PATCH 2/4] " Zoltán Böszörményi
2026-03-21 7:36 ` [whinlatter][PATCH 3/4] " Zoltán Böszörményi
2026-03-21 7:36 ` [whinlatter][PATCH 4/4] " Zoltán Böszörményi
2026-03-21 9:19 ` [OE-core] [whinlatter][PATCH 0/4] " Yoann Congal
2026-03-21 14:02 ` Böszörményi Zoltán
2026-03-21 18:45 ` Yoann Congal
2026-03-22 7:11 ` Böszörményi Zoltán [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c4e5c72f-84eb-419f-ba74-7a091de6848f@gmail.com \
--to=zboszor@gmail.com \
--cc=max@igalia.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=yoann.congal@smile.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox