Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ltp: Update to 20240129

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

Hi Petr,

On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 00:52 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Alexandre, all,
> 
> > On 31/01/2024 19:32:43+0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Removed patch accepted upstream as
> > > 8c53cc947 ("testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl: define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE")
> 
> > > Rebase runtest/mm patch.
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > Hi Richard, Daniel, Khem,
> 
> > > could anybody please test this update if build (it should).
> 
> > > Also, it'd be good nice to rerun proc01 -m 128 and report me with the
> > > details, maybe we can fix it. If still problematic, it'd be nice to turn
> > > disable_hanging_tests.patch into proper git patch (makes rebasing patch
> > > on new LTP version easier).
> 
> > This fails on the autobuilders:
> 
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/95/builds/5957/steps/12/logs/stdio
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/96/builds/5917/steps/12/logs/stdio
> 
> 
> Thanks for testing this, you probably mean the warning before python stack trace:
> 
> scp: /opt/ltp/results/connectors: No such file or directory
> WARNING: core-image-sato-1.0-r0 do_testimage: File could not be copied. Output: scp: /opt/ltp/results/connectors: No such file or directory
> 
> The problem is not due packaging, but simply runtest/connectors was removed [1],
> thus your tooling has to be fixed not to expect it (not trying to run it).
> I'm sorry, we sometimes do cleanup which brings incompatibility issue
> (here it did not make sense to start SUT just for single test, thus we moved the
> test to runtest/kernel_misc).

I did try again with that removed:

https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/96/builds/5929/steps/12/logs/stdio
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/95/builds/5968/steps/12/logs/stdio

which comes down to:

scp: /opt/ltp/results/fsx: No such file or directory

so I'll remove that and try again.

Are there any additions we should be considering too? This all feels a
little fragile so I'm wondering if we should be reworking the way we
handle this?

Cheers,

Richard