Re: [OE-core][dunfell 7/8] qemu: add 34Kf-64tlb fictitious cpu type

["Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 04:15 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> From: Victor Kamensky <kamensky@cisco.com>
> 
> In Yocto Project PR 13992 it was reported that qemumips
> in autobuilder runs almost twice slower then qemumips64 and
> some times hit time out.
> 
> Upon investigations of qemu-system with perf, gdb, and
> SystemTap and comparing qemumips and qemumips64 machines
> behavior it was noticed that qemu soft mmu code behaves
> quite different and in case if qemumips tlbwr instruction
> called 16 times more oftern. It happens that in qemumips64
> case qemu runs with cpu type that contains 64 TLB, but in case
> of qemumips qemu runs with cpu type that contains only
> 16 TLBs.
> 
> The idea of proposed qemu patch is to introduce fictitious
> 34Kf-64tlb cpu type that defined exactly as 34Kf but has
> 64 TLBs, instead of original 16 TLBs.
> 
> Testing of core-image-full-cmdline:do_testimage with
> 34Kf-64tlb shows 40% or so test execution real time
> improvement.
> 
> Note for future porters of the patch: easiest way to update
> the patch and be in sync with 34Kf definition is to copy
> 34Kf machine definition and apply the following changes to
> it (just change 15 to 63 of CP0C1_MMU bits value)

There is discussion upstream about just changing the tlb to 64 for this
machine. I'd suggest we hold off this for dunfell until its resolved
there.

Cheers,

Richard