Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Fix the SDK generation
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 19:17:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1312243899.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com> (raw)

This is an attempt to fix a number of issues with the SDK generation.  It has been
tested using bitbake meta-toolchain-sdk.

Note, patches:

 4/5: package_ipk: SDK generation workaround
 5/5: update-alternatives: Add alternatives as a runtime provide

4/5 might be reasonable to implement immediately to resolve this issue.. However
5/5 is absolutely incorrect and that is noted within the patch header.  I'd
like comments on the issue to understand how to fix the problem.


The following changes since commit 2a41a311ddda11713296391050f3c2c1b2c1d3d3:

  arch-armv7a.inc: fix armv7a-vfp-neon -> armv7a compat case (2011-08-01 16:49:03 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib mhatle/oecore/sdk-fix-WIP
  http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=mhatle/oecore/sdk-fix-WIP

Mark Hatle (5):
  rootfs_rpm: Cleanup and minor bug fixes
  bitbake.conf: Add SDK_PACKAGE_ARCHS
  populate_sdk_*: Sync SDK and regular rootfs functions
  package_ipk: SDK generation workaround
  update-alternatives: Add alternatives as a runtime provide

 meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass         |    6 +-
 meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass         |   43 +++++------
 meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass         |  120 ++++++++++++------------------
 meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass        |    9 ++
 meta/classes/populate_sdk_deb.bbclass    |   35 ++++-----
 meta/classes/populate_sdk_rpm.bbclass    |   89 +++++++++++++++++------
 meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass          |   30 ++++----
 meta/classes/update-alternatives.bbclass |    2 +
 meta/conf/bitbake.conf                   |    1 +
 9 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.3.4




             reply	other threads:[~2011-08-02  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-02  0:17 Mark Hatle [this message]
2011-08-02  0:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] rootfs_rpm: Cleanup and minor bug fixes Mark Hatle
2011-08-02  0:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] bitbake.conf: Add SDK_PACKAGE_ARCHS Mark Hatle
2011-08-02  0:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] populate_sdk_*: Sync SDK and regular rootfs functions Mark Hatle
2011-08-02  0:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] package_ipk: SDK generation workaround Mark Hatle
2011-08-02  0:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] update-alternatives: Add alternatives as a runtime provide Mark Hatle
2011-08-02 13:46   ` Phil Blundell
2011-08-02 14:49     ` Mark Hatle
2011-08-03 12:20       ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-03 14:41         ` Mark Hatle
2011-08-03 15:40           ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-03 16:03             ` Mark Hatle
2011-08-03 16:09               ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-02 13:34 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix the SDK generation Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1312243899.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox