From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from masterfoo.zenlinux.com ([207.192.74.254]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RbgVJ-0002nO-U3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:43:50 +0100 Received: from localhost (c-76-115-40-64.hsd1.or.comcast.net [76.115.40.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by masterfoo.zenlinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361FC2FF5D for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:36:41 -0500 (EST) From: Scott Garman To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:36:25 -0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 X-MasterFoo-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 361FC2FF5D.A7189 X-MasterFoo-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MasterFoo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam X-MasterFoo-MailScanner-From: scott.a.garman@intel.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: [PATCH 0/8] New QA tests for unsafe references to exec_prefix X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:43:50 -0000 Hello, This is a P2 feature for Yocto 1.2. It adds two new QA tests to check files in base_bindir, base_sbindir, and base_libdir for references to files under exec_prefix (e.g, dynamic linking for binaries and references to exec_prefix in scripts). The reason for these tests is that exec_prefix (typically /usr) can be kept on a separate partition that may be mounted late in the boot process, or may not be mounted at all during system recovery operations. It was my original goal to make the dynamic linking test a QA error upon failure, but it turned out the amount of recipe work needed was much larger than I expected. So for the time being they have been changed to generate QA warmings. The libraries I've moved to base_libdir in this pull request should take care of all binaries in /bin and /sbin for packages we include in core-image-minimal and -sato. I would like to ask recipe maintainers to look for these QA warnings and fix them ASAP, as I believe we'll be changing this to a QA error before the release of 1.2. Scott The following changes since commit 3e05acab1c119a3b2a4703ea8729cc768935d36e: license.bbclass: remove bashism (2011-12-16 16:50:39 +0000) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib sgarman/per-recipe-sanitychk-final http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=sgarman/per-recipe-sanitychk-final Scott Garman (8): ncurses: move libraries to base_libdir libcap: move library to base_libdir util-linux: move libraries to base_libdir e2fsprogs: move libraries to base_libdir libusb1: move libraries to base_libdir libusb-compat: move libraries to base_libdir prelink: update to latest git version insane.bbclass: add QA tests for unsafe references to exec_prefix meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 111 +++++++++++++++++++- .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc | 8 +- meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses.inc | 26 +++-- meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc | 20 ++-- meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.19.1.bb | 2 +- .../e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.41.14.bb | 29 +++-- meta/recipes-devtools/prelink/prelink_git.bb | 2 +- meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap.inc | 15 +++- meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.22.bb | 2 +- meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb | 12 ++- meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb | 16 +++- 11 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) -- 1.7.5.4