From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from masterfoo.zenlinux.com ([207.192.74.254]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RiI57-0001Vk-Ie for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:04:05 +0100 Received: from localhost (c-76-115-40-64.hsd1.or.comcast.net [76.115.40.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by masterfoo.zenlinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7898A30226 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:56:39 -0500 (EST) From: Scott Garman To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 19:56:50 -0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 X-MasterFoo-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 7898A30226.B6CB5 X-MasterFoo-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MasterFoo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam X-MasterFoo-MailScanner-From: scott.a.garman@intel.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: [PATCH 0/7] New QA tests for unsafe references to exec_prefix [v2] X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:04:05 -0000 Hello, This is a P2 feature for Yocto 1.2. It adds two new QA tests to check files in base_bindir, base_sbindir, and base_libdir for references to files under exec_prefix (e.g, dynamic linking for binaries and references to exec_prefix in scripts). The reason for these tests is that exec_prefix (typically /usr) can be kept on a separate partition that may be mounted late in the boot process, or may not be mounted at all during system recovery operations. It was my original goal to make the dynamic linking test a QA error upon failure, but it turned out the amount of recipe work needed was much larger than I expected. So for the time being they have been changed to generate QA warmings. The libraries I've moved to base_libdir in this pull request should take care of all binaries in /bin and /sbin for packages we include in core-image-minimal and -sato. I would like to ask recipe maintainers to look for these QA warnings and fix them ASAP, as I believe we'll be changing this to a QA error before the release of 1.2. This is a second pull request that is rebased against the latest master with merge conflicts resolved, and only sets BUILD_LDFLAGS in ncurses.inc for virtclass-native. Scott The following changes since commit de679a3036ebef1c7d7b8ee23f05590c95e498d9: pseudo: ensure libs are included in package (2012-01-03 12:10:59 +0000) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib sgarman/per-recipe-sanitychk-final http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=sgarman/per-recipe-sanitychk-final Scott Garman (7): ncurses: move libraries to base_libdir libcap: move library to base_libdir util-linux: move libraries to base_libdir e2fsprogs: move libraries to base_libdir libusb1: move libraries to base_libdir libusb-compat: move libraries to base_libdir insane.bbclass: add QA tests for unsafe references to exec_prefix meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 111 +++++++++++++++++++- meta/recipes-core/ncurses/ncurses.inc | 27 +++-- meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc | 20 ++-- meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.20.1.bb | 2 +- .../e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.41.14.bb | 29 +++-- meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap.inc | 15 +++- meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.22.bb | 2 +- meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb | 12 ++- meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb | 16 +++- 9 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) -- 1.7.5.4