From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
To: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, liang.li@windriver.com,
saul.wold@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] perf: make perf a standlone recipe
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:23:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1339791495.git.bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> (raw)
Richard/Saul,
We've wanted to do this for some time, and now have finally split
out perf from being a sub-part of the kernel packages into a
standalone package that is built out of the kernel sources.
I've built and tested this by adding task-core-tools-profile to
my IMAGE_INSTALL, and perf behaves just as it did before. I've
also tested this on my oe-core checkout/repo, and it works fine
there as well (but I'm using my easier to access contrib
branch for now).
There's additional work that can be done more easily once this
is split, so please consider this for inclusion, but I'd like
to keep this initial version as an exact functional match as
what was previously in place.
I've removed the old linux-tools.inc and updated any kernel
recipes that I know about that have references to it. If there
are other dependent recipes, they'll need to be updated.
From the patch itself:
perf has been coupled to the kernel packages via kernel.bbclass.
While maintaining the build of perf out of the kernel source tree
is desired the package coupling has proved to be awkward in
several situations such as:
- when a kernel recipe doesn't want to build/provide perf
- when licensing of dependencies would prohibit perf and hence
the kernel from being built.
To solve some of these problems, this recipe is the extraction of
the linux-tools.inc provided perf compilation into a standalone
perf recipe that builds out of the kernel source, but is otherwise
independent.
No new functionality is provided above what the linux-tools.inc
variant provided, but the separate recipe provides baseline for
adding new functionality.
This addresses [YOCTO #1552]
cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
cc: Liang Li <liang.li@windriver.com>
Cheers,
Bruce
The following changes since commit 4bb7ef94fca392bcd389ed7069280c238f8fe094:
directfb: added missing Upstream-status (2012-06-15 15:44:39 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib zedd/perf
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/perf
Bruce Ashfield (1):
recipes-kernel: remove linux-tools.inc
Liang Li (1):
recipes-kernel: make perf a standalone package
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 7 +---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 41 ------------------
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bb | 2 -
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.2.bb | 2 -
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.4.bb | 2 -
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb | 2 -
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bb | 2 -
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bb | 2 -
meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++
9 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb
--
1.7.7
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 20:23 Bruce Ashfield [this message]
2012-06-15 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] recipes-kernel: make perf a standalone package Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-16 17:34 ` Saul Wold
2012-06-16 17:47 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-17 1:19 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-17 3:16 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-19 19:11 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-15 20:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] recipes-kernel: remove linux-tools.inc Bruce Ashfield
2012-06-18 0:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf: make perf a standlone recipe Tom Zanussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1339791495.git.bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--to=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=liang.li@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=saul.wold@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox