From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] run-postinsts refactoring
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:41:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1370502833.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1369313581.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
(cover letter only)
Changes in v2:
* addressed an RPM issue that happened on AB. Interestingly, it happened only on
certain distros. Our internal AB (running on Ubuntu server 12.04), didn't show
any issues. So, what was the problem? We use a scriptlet wrapper to run the
pre/post install scriptlets. What I missed in the previous patchset was that I
didn't use the scriptlet wrapper when running the pre/post remove scriptlets
and the context in which they ran was not correct. Hence, the update-rc.d used
was the host's...
* addresses Ross's request to move run-postinsts recipe out of dpkg directory,
since it's generic now;
Paul, Mark would you please review the RPM changes please?
Thanks,
Laurentiu
Changes in v1:
Hi all,
My work at #4484 revealed that the package managers deb/ipk/rpm handle removal
of PM meta-data (when the PM is not deployed) and the delayed postinstalls
execution in their own way. Currently we have:
* run-postinsts (for deb/ipk) and rpm-postinsts (for rpm) for running the delayed
postinstalls on target when the PM is not part of the image;
* opkg removes the meta-data and some uneeded packages whilst deb/rpm remove
only the meta-data;
* both opkg and deb have no way of running the delayed postinstalls on target,
if package-management is not part of IMAGE_FEATURES, because the meta-data
was deleted (and it would have been useless anyway since the PM is not installed);
That being said, this patchset tries to create a more unified solution for all
PM backends.
rpm-postinsts recipe is replaced by run-postinsts but I'll keep it in oe-core
for a while (a couple of weeks maybe), just in case the current solution does not
satisfy the RPM users (I doubt it though).
I did tests with core-image-minimal using sysvinit/systemd and with/without delayed
postinstalls. The results are as expected.
Thanks,
Laurentiu
The following changes since commit a62aed41f2d8f874f7ae24d0e5be5dbc66ea2199:
lrzsz: check locale.h in configure (2013-06-04 15:55:46 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib lpalcu/run_postinsts_refactor_v2
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=lpalcu/run_postinsts_refactor_v2
Laurentiu Palcu (7):
rootfs_*.bbclass: add some helper functions
image.bbclass: remove unneeded files from the image
core-image-minimal: do not remove packaging files in the rootfs
postprocess
run-postinsts: make it generic
rootfs_rpm.bbclass: switch to using run-postinsts
package_rpm.bbclass: handle pre/post remove scriptlets
rpm: replace rpm-postinsts dependency with run-postinsts
meta/classes/image.bbclass | 33 ++++++++++++++
meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass | 16 ++++---
meta/classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass | 23 +++++++++-
meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 39 ++++++++--------
meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass | 29 ++++++++++--
meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal.bb | 2 -
.../dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts | 36 ---------------
.../dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts.awk | 30 -------------
meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.9.bb | 2 +-
.../run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++
.../{dpkg => run-postinsts}/run-postinsts_1.0.bb | 7 ++-
11 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
delete mode 100755 meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/run-postinsts/run-postinsts.awk
create mode 100755 meta/recipes-devtools/run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts
rename meta/recipes-devtools/{dpkg => run-postinsts}/run-postinsts_1.0.bb (68%)
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-06 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 13:15 [PATCH 0/7] run-postinsts refactoring Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-23 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/7] systemd: add udev-utils dependency for udev-hwdb Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-23 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/7] rootfs_*.bbclass: add some helper functions Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-23 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/7] image.bbclass: remove unneeded files from the image Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-23 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/7] core-image-minimal: do not remove packaging files in the rootfs postprocess Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-23 13:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] run-postinsts: make it generic Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-23 15:19 ` Burton, Ross
2013-05-23 13:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] rootfs_rpm.bbclas: switch to using run-postinsts Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-23 13:15 ` [PATCH 7/7] rpm: replace rpm-postinsts dependency with run-postinsts Laurentiu Palcu
2013-05-24 3:38 ` [PATCH 0/7] run-postinsts refactoring Saul Wold
2013-05-24 10:35 ` Laurentiu Palcu
2013-06-06 7:41 ` Laurentiu Palcu [this message]
2013-06-06 16:43 ` [PATCH v2 " Mark Hatle
2013-06-06 18:09 ` Laurentiu Palcu
2013-06-06 18:22 ` Mark Hatle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1370502833.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--to=laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox