From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] SDK buildhistory fixes (cover letter only)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:56:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1395226050.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1395142153.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
v2:
* I passed deploy_dir instead of target_rootfs to RpmPkgsList constructor...
Strangely enough, this could be caught only when building core-image-minimal
(which I didn't use in my tests).
The buildhistory dependency files for target/host SDK packages were not properly
created because the wrapper function called, list_installed_packages(), was always
looking in the image rootfs.
This patchset will rename the old wrapper function to image_list_installed_packages()
and create a new one, for SDK stuff, sdk_list_installed_packages().
The changes in package_manager.py, even though they appear to be lots, its the
same code moved around from one class to a newly created PkgsList class. So, the
logic remains the same.
Tested for all backends (buildhistory activated) with the following:
bitbake core-image-sato && bitbake -c populate_sdk core-image-sato
laurentiu
The following changes since commit 0150bc30d3674301631c2e9b6c64e01058fd1070:
bitbake: runqueue: Really fix sigchld handling (2014-03-18 23:05:53 +0000)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib lpalcu/buildhistory_sdk_dep_files_fix
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=lpalcu/buildhistory_sdk_dep_files_fix
Laurentiu Palcu (4):
package_manager.py: create separate class for installed packages
listing
rootfs.py, sdk.py: adjust/create the wrappers for creating installed
packages list
image.bbclass, license.bbclass: adjust the name of
list_installed_packages()
buildhistory.bbclass: create proper dependency files for SDK
meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 40 ++--
meta/classes/image.bbclass | 4 +-
meta/classes/license.bbclass | 4 +-
meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 376 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py | 19 +-
meta/lib/oe/sdk.py | 18 ++
6 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-19 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 11:38 [PATCH 0/4] SDK buildhistory fixes Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] package_manager.py: create separate class for installed packages listing Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] rootfs.py, sdk.py: adjust/create the wrappers for creating installed packages list Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] image.bbclass, license.bbclass: adjust the name of list_installed_packages() Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-18 11:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] buildhistory.bbclass: create proper dependency files for SDK Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-19 10:56 ` Laurentiu Palcu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1395226050.git.laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--to=laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox