From: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
<mark.hatle@windriver.com>, <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: saul.wold@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] only allowed sstate-cache objects are allowed in a build (read-only sstate-cache?)
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 15:15:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1407306581.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com> (raw)
Issue description:
The issue is that the developer who demand only the "new" software
they write is allowed to be compiled from source, they only want to
reuse binaries from an existed sstate-cache, if the developer makes
a change that triggers a rebuild, it should be an instant error.
The purpose of this is for the sstate-cache to check if the item
exists or not. If it doesn't the item needs to be in a whitelist
or we need to fail.
I dig into three approaches to implement, and send them to oe-core
list to see if the community has a preference as to the approach,
and any additional comments.
In these approaches, I'm not sure we should protect the 'clean' or
not. Since it's ok to clean the sstate-cache, as long as a mirror
fetch will pull it back down. Any suggestion is welcomed.
If you have any better ideas, please don't hesitate to share with us.
Test steps:
1) For approach 1
INHERIT += 'sstate_readonly'
For approach 2
INHERIT += 'sstate_readonly_2'
2) Create a sstate cache for testing
$ bitbake db
3) Add gzip to SSTATECACHE_WHITELIST, it enabled read-only sstate-cache,
vim local.conf
...
SSTATECACHE_WHITELIST = 'gzip'
...
4) Remove tmp dir and build db from sstate-cache succeed
$ mv tmp tmp-back && bitbake db
5) tweak db's do_configure task by adding comments
--- a/meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.30.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/db/db_6.0.30.bb
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://../LICENSE;md5=1ec8b0b17cc31513fe35ab10716f8490"
@@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ do_configure() {
gnu-configize --force ${S}
export STRIP="true"
oe_runconf
+ echo "hello"
}
6) build db and there is a build failure
$ bitbake db
7) clean db and there is a clean failure
bitbake db -ccleansstate
8) Append the missing recipe's PN to SSTATECACHE_WHITELIST
vim local.conf
...
SSTATECACHE_WHITELIST = 'gzip db rpm-native gcc-runtime eglibc linux-libc-headers libgcc'
...
9) Build db and clean db succeed
$ bitbake db && bitbake db -ccleansstate
//Hongxu
The following changes since commit 870bb8d35547b8313b3a487d7e8b914ab9470e64:
local.conf.sample.extended: fix example for EXTRA_USERS_PARAMS (2014-08-04 17:38:24 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib hongxu/readonly-sstatecache
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=hongxu/readonly-sstatecache
Hongxu Jia (3):
bbclass/sstate_readonly approach 1: add prefuncs to SSTATETASKS
bbclass/sstate_readonly_2 approach 2: add event handler at TaskStarted
time
bbclass/sstate approach 3: add checking in the return path of
sstate_checkhashes
meta/classes/sstate.bbclass | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
meta/classes/sstate_readonly.bbclass | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
meta/classes/sstate_readonly_2.bbclass | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/classes/sstate_readonly.bbclass
create mode 100644 meta/classes/sstate_readonly_2.bbclass
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-06 7:15 Hongxu Jia [this message]
2014-08-06 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] bbclass/sstate_readonly approach 1: add prefuncs to SSTATETASKS Hongxu Jia
2014-08-06 7:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] bbclass/sstate_readonly_2 approach 2: add event handler at TaskStarted time Hongxu Jia
2014-08-06 7:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] bbclass/sstate approach 3: add checking in the return path of sstate_checkhashes Hongxu Jia
2014-08-20 10:32 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] only allowed sstate-cache objects are allowed in a build (read-only sstate-cache?) Hongxu Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1407306581.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
--to=hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=saul.wold@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox