From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com (mail-pg0-f66.google.com [74.125.83.66]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3164F71E15 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-f66.google.com with SMTP id 194so16980458pgd.0 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:45:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aUnluupgg8ptRV5ycbvT8InJOODbVbd2gRjmqn0SdOU=; b=dKCEZbXrT+1qj9Mkf4tAzoHsC6THosrN4TtmTspABu84f3aYmVCSbQVn95WAon0bpt voZPFcxgBJwjFRFlfNYeyD4vohko8arr345OW7KERGrSUHSvOkkFJEbBLsSAnTottK3h LP9RRbjD9PTFywhcJ/nIPJCok1QSVyFnG7Wl/keDdxFgkIsLwtNYRkAHO1Wnc1WUPGgi R/HYyDD0/tgKNg5s7L1h3A4ghMns7gyhCP5CaLN+C7MyWf2KwYr02kAiAWEfKbAkwHub QrU0LUETm8VLJRfY3+qi/eimxahKUU0LloRaT8NivE+jTajIFJkygoZIx+opO5Y+/q10 5/lQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aUnluupgg8ptRV5ycbvT8InJOODbVbd2gRjmqn0SdOU=; b=LBILLbRBGIhigMOz0WSZm43aB5CtdtVg1O0cxezPjMER/Twhpa/o8LzeVqV73fTRzJ JOIG7TEVd7uvezTFIeuUrttkpXHUJLfSxBS27HcYpFiPlh96FCKv7AD8SWFMHsmBSxBz or2KyCo164I3eiLztrtnJQAFvtVNxFrxOABr4gh0wRQ4Q8Zw/srXOcLgBGski4kgGCmk tPu5l6Bh297ymOlAawWWedogZIUGMxc/hHyuNTHedaXwAcRAJ5La8J7Zm1qb/2wHcAcQ IlicMc3Qn4DcegoS7VhvWXkwqDticPeIHi2v6EcXIo2QqVxs3XJ/3sZAtPnx1oxNjSQh mh1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLr8FPVMbzs+lsGlbUpj90QH9LGvcPPV8hnsidykPTmwoNMFz15kNrlE38Ua2cVLA== X-Received: by 10.98.95.70 with SMTP id t67mr36571568pfb.37.1485272755376; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:45:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:202:4001:9ea0:ea2a:eaff:fe0e:629e? ([2601:202:4001:9ea0:ea2a:eaff:fe0e:629e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u75sm6731372pgc.31.2017.01.24.07.45.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:45:54 -0800 (PST) To: Mike Looijmans , Nathan Rossi References: <1479848501-5451-1-git-send-email-manjukumar.harthikote-matha@xilinx.com> <14EB1FFCA0C8D24A8B04EDEC1EA78C2453DBB31E@XSJ-PSEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com> <05c7dfd0-38f3-b684-db94-38121b086a67@topic.nl> <1efda273-0a0f-e75d-1364-6ac1815154fe@topic.nl> From: akuster808 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:45:37 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1efda273-0a0f-e75d-1364-6ac1815154fe@topic.nl> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][Morty] binutils-2.27.inc: Fix alignment frags for aarch64 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:45:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/23/2017 10:48 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > On 18-01-17 17:09, akuster808 wrote: >> >> >> On 01/18/2017 04:08 AM, Nathan Rossi wrote: >>> On 18 January 2017 at 19:37, Mike Looijmans >>> wrote: >>>> Could someone at least please say "yes" or "no"? >>>> >>>> I now have three projects waiting for this patch to be included in >>>> morty. If >>>> it's not going to happen, I'll have to add a bbappend to these >>>> layers to fix >>>> it. >>>> >>>> On 16-01-17 18:49, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote: >>>>> Ping, this has been applied to master >>> Armin, you mentioned on IRC ~1 week ago that you had merged it to your >>> staging branch? Any updates? >>> Also I had a look and could not find the change in >>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=akuster/morty-next? >>> >>> >>> Maybe I am looking in the wrong place though for your staging tree? >> I forgot to press go. Its there now. > > Much appreciated. > > Who's next in line to press "go" now? I still have three projects > waiting. Richard or one of his minions. > > Apparently the ARM64 isn't very popular, no one seems to care about > its build failures... > > > > Kind regards, > > Mike Looijmans > System Expert > > TOPIC Products > Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best > Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best > Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 > E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com > Website: www.topicproducts.com > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > > > > >