From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
<stefan.herbrechtsmeier-oss@weidmueller.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] recipetool/create: Scan for SDPX-License-Identifier
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 13:41:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d532984a72be45bc75ea6fc80e46664dfb01efa7.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ede83ba-c6f1-4dac-8dbd-44cc67d16062@weidmueller.com>
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 10:05 +0100, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Am 03.02.2022 um 22:24 schrieb Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org:
> > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 09:07 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
> > > When a file can not be identified by checksum and they contain an SPDX
> > > License-Identifier tag, use it as the found license.
> > >
> > > [YOCTO #14529]
> > >
> > > Tested with LICENSE files that contain 1 or more SPDX-License-Identifier tags
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <saul.wold@windriver.com>
> > > ---
> > > scripts/lib/recipetool/create.py | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/lib/recipetool/create.py b/scripts/lib/recipetool/create.py
> > > index 507a230511..9149c2d94f 100644
> > > --- a/scripts/lib/recipetool/create.py
> > > +++ b/scripts/lib/recipetool/create.py
> > > @@ -1221,14 +1221,20 @@ def guess_license(srctree, d):
> > > for licfile in sorted(licfiles):
> > > md5value = bb.utils.md5_file(licfile)
> > > license = md5sums.get(md5value, None)
> > > + license_list = []
> > > if not license:
> > > license, crunched_md5, lictext = crunch_license(licfile)
> > > if lictext and not license:
> > > - license = 'Unknown'
> > > - logger.info("Please add the following line for '%s' to a 'lib/recipetool/licenses.csv' " \
> > > - "and replace `Unknown` with the license:\n" \
> > > - "%s,Unknown" % (os.path.relpath(licfile, srctree), md5value))
> > > - if license:
> > > + spdx_re = re.compile('SPDX-License-Identifier:\s+([-A-Za-z\d. ]+)[ |\n|\r\n]*?')
> > > + license_list = re.findall(spdx_re, "\n".join(lictext))
> > > + if not license_list:
> > > + license_list.append('Unknown')
> > > + logger.info("Please add the following line for '%s' to a 'lib/recipetool/licenses.csv' " \
> > > + "and replace `Unknown` with the license:\n" \
> > > + "%s,Unknown" % (os.path.relpath(licfile, srctree), md5value))
> > > + else:
> > > + license_list.append(license)
> > > + for license in license_list:
> > > licenses.append((license, os.path.relpath(licfile, srctree), md5value))
> > >
> > > # FIXME should we grab at least one source file with a license header and add that too?
> >
> > I think to close this bug the code may need to go one step further and
> > effectively grep over the source tree.
>
> Please keep in mind that we need a full license text and not only the
> license name for license compliance. The current function only search
> for license files with license text.
>
> > We'd probably want to list the value of any SPDX-License-Identifier: header
> > found in any of the source files for the user to then decide upon?
>
> I think this is an other feature like a license checker because if you
> have a SPDX-License-Identifier without a license text you have a license
> violation.
>
> This brings us to the problem that this code will interpret a file with
> only a SPDX-License-Identifier as a license file with license text.
As I understand it the tool is there to help write a recipe so filling out
LICENSE and highlighting a missing full license text would be a valid approach
for the tool and helpful to the user?
It certainly isn't intended as full validation, just intended to assist the
creation of a recipe.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 17:07 [PATCH] recipetool/create: Scan for SDPX-License-Identifier Saul Wold
2022-02-03 21:24 ` [OE-core] " Richard Purdie
2022-02-03 21:58 ` Saul Wold
2022-02-03 22:01 ` Richard Purdie
2022-02-04 9:05 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2022-02-04 13:41 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2022-02-04 14:40 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
2022-02-04 8:11 ` Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d532984a72be45bc75ea6fc80e46664dfb01efa7.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=stefan.herbrechtsmeier-oss@weidmueller.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox